Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-91-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-91-2010
27 Jan 2010
 | 27 Jan 2010

Field inter-comparison of eleven atmospheric ammonia measurement techniques

K. von Bobrutzki, C. F. Braban, D. Famulari, S. K. Jones, T. Blackall, T. E. L. Smith, M. Blom, H. Coe, M. Gallagher, M. Ghalaieny, M. R. McGillen, C. J. Percival, J. D. Whitehead, R. Ellis, J. Murphy, A. Mohacsi, A. Pogany, H. Junninen, S. Rantanen, M. A. Sutton, and E. Nemitz

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Intercomparison of commercial analyzers for atmospheric ethane and methane observations
Róisín Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, and Lee T. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1431–1441, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1431-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1431-2023, 2023
Short summary
Real-time measurement of phase partitioning of organic compounds using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer coupled to a CHARON inlet
Yarong Peng, Hongli Wang, Yaqin Gao, Shengao Jing, Shuhui Zhu, Dandan Huang, Peizhi Hao, Shengrong Lou, Tiantao Cheng, Cheng Huang, and Xuan Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 15–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparison of atmospheric CO, CO2 and CH4 measurements at Schneefernerhaus and the mountain ridge at Zugspitze
Antje Hoheisel, Cedric Couret, Bryan Hellack, and Martina Schmidt
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-298,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-298, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure
Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6285–6296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands
Broghan M. Erland, Cristen Adams, Andrea Darlington, Mackenzie L. Smith, Andrew K. Thorpe, Gregory R. Wentworth, Steve Conley, John Liggio, Shao-Meng Li, Charles E. Miller, and John A. Gamon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5841–5859, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A., and Schjorring, J. K.: Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition, New Phytol., 139, 27–48, 1998.
Bacon, T., Webber, K., and Carpio, R. A.: Contamination monitoring for ammonia, amines, and acid gases utilizing ion mobility spectroscopy (IMS), Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., Metrology, Inspection and Process Control for Microlithography XII, ISBN 0-8194-2777-2, 3332, 550–559, 1998.
Berden, G., Peeters, R., and Meijer, G.: Cavity ring-down spectroscopy: Experimental schemes and applications, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem., 19, 565–607, 2000.
Blatter, A., Neftel, A., Dasgupta, P. K., and Simon, P. K.: A combined wet effluent denuder and mist chamber system for deposition measurements of NH3, NH4, HNO3- and NO3, in: Physicochemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants, edited by: Angeletti, G. and Restelli, G., European Commission, Brussels, 767–772, 1994.
Breitenbach, L. P. and Shelef, M.: Development of a method for the analysis of NO2 and NH3 by NO- measuring instruments, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 23, 128–131, 1973.
Download