Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1361-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1361-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
31 Mar 2016
Research article |
| 31 Mar 2016
Dimensioning IRGA gas sampling systems: laboratory and field experiments
Marc Aubinet
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA, Ecosystems –
Atmosphere Exchanges, Liège, Belgium
Lilian Joly
University of Reims, Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et
Atmosphérique, Reims, France
Denis Loustau
INRA, UMR ISPA, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France
Anne De Ligne
University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA, Ecosystems –
Atmosphere Exchanges, Liège, Belgium
Henri Chopin
University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA, Ecosystems –
Atmosphere Exchanges, Liège, Belgium
Julien Cousin
University of Reims, Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et
Atmosphérique, Reims, France
Nicolas Chauvin
University of Reims, Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et
Atmosphérique, Reims, France
Thomas Decarpenterie
University of Reims, Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et
Atmosphérique, Reims, France
Patrick Gross
INRA, UMR EEF, 54280 Champenoux, France
Viewed
Total article views: 3,511 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Oct 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,185 | 1,159 | 167 | 3,511 | 106 | 117 |
- HTML: 2,185
- PDF: 1,159
- XML: 167
- Total: 3,511
- BibTeX: 106
- EndNote: 117
Total article views: 2,648 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 Mar 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,836 | 660 | 152 | 2,648 | 98 | 104 |
- HTML: 1,836
- PDF: 660
- XML: 152
- Total: 2,648
- BibTeX: 98
- EndNote: 104
Total article views: 863 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Oct 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 349 | 499 | 15 | 863 | 8 | 13 |
- HTML: 349
- PDF: 499
- XML: 15
- Total: 863
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 13
Cited
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The high-frequency response correction of eddy covariance fluxes – Part 1: An experimental approach and its interdependence with the time-lag estimation O. Peltola et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5071-2021
- The NASA Carbon Airborne Flux Experiment (CARAFE): instrumentation and methodology G. Wolfe et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018
- Evaluation of a lower-powered analyzer and sampling system for eddy-covariance measurements of nitrous oxide fluxes S. Brown et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1583-2018
- Comparison of Lyman-alpha and LI-COR infrared hygrometers for airborne measurement of turbulent fluctuations of water vapour A. Lampert et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2523-2018
- Quantifying the uncertainty of eddy covariance fluxes due to the use of different software packages and combinations of processing steps in two contrasting ecosystems I. Mammarella et al. 10.5194/amt-9-4915-2016
- Spatiotemporal limitations in plant biology research S. Munné-Bosch 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.005
- Optimization of an enclosed gas analyzer sampling system for measuring eddy covariance fluxes of H<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> S. Metzger et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1341-2016
- Addressing a systematic bias in carbon dioxide flux measurements with the EC150 and the IRGASON open-path gas analyzers M. Helbig et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.018
- Eddy covariance flux errors due to random and systematic timing errors during data acquisition G. Fratini et al. 10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018
- Surface-Energy-Balance Closure over Land: A Review M. Mauder et al. 10.1007/s10546-020-00529-6
- An eddy-covariance system with an innovative vortex intake for measuring carbon dioxide and water fluxes of ecosystems J. Ma et al. 10.5194/amt-10-1259-2017
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The high-frequency response correction of eddy covariance fluxes – Part 1: An experimental approach and its interdependence with the time-lag estimation O. Peltola et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5071-2021
- The NASA Carbon Airborne Flux Experiment (CARAFE): instrumentation and methodology G. Wolfe et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018
- Evaluation of a lower-powered analyzer and sampling system for eddy-covariance measurements of nitrous oxide fluxes S. Brown et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1583-2018
- Comparison of Lyman-alpha and LI-COR infrared hygrometers for airborne measurement of turbulent fluctuations of water vapour A. Lampert et al. 10.5194/amt-11-2523-2018
- Quantifying the uncertainty of eddy covariance fluxes due to the use of different software packages and combinations of processing steps in two contrasting ecosystems I. Mammarella et al. 10.5194/amt-9-4915-2016
- Spatiotemporal limitations in plant biology research S. Munné-Bosch 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.005
- Optimization of an enclosed gas analyzer sampling system for measuring eddy covariance fluxes of H<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> S. Metzger et al. 10.5194/amt-9-1341-2016
- Addressing a systematic bias in carbon dioxide flux measurements with the EC150 and the IRGASON open-path gas analyzers M. Helbig et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.018
- Eddy covariance flux errors due to random and systematic timing errors during data acquisition G. Fratini et al. 10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018
- Surface-Energy-Balance Closure over Land: A Review M. Mauder et al. 10.1007/s10546-020-00529-6
- An eddy-covariance system with an innovative vortex intake for measuring carbon dioxide and water fluxes of ecosystems J. Ma et al. 10.5194/amt-10-1259-2017
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Short summary
Laboratory and field experiments were carried out in order to define suitable configuration ranges for the gas sampling systems of infrared gas analyzers used in eddy covariance measurements. They show that filters may have a strong impact on the pressure drop in the GSS but no significant impact on cut-off frequency. Conversely, the rain cup design was found to be the main limiting factor of cut-off frequency in the field. Its impact on pressure drop was also found to be noteworthy.
Laboratory and field experiments were carried out in order to define suitable configuration...
