Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Volume 10, issue 3 | Copyright

Special issue: Pushing the limits: The eXperimental Planetary boundary layer...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1229-1240, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1229-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 30 Mar 2017

Research article | 30 Mar 2017

Validating precision estimates in horizontal wind measurements from a Doppler lidar

Rob K. Newsom1, W. Alan Brewer2, James M. Wilczak2, Daniel E. Wolfe2,3, Steven P. Oncley4, and Julie K. Lundquist5,6 Rob K. Newsom et al.
  • 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
  • 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
  • 3Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
  • 4National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
  • 5Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • 6National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA

Abstract. Results from a recent field campaign are used to assess the accuracy of wind speed and direction precision estimates produced by a Doppler lidar wind retrieval algorithm. The algorithm, which is based on the traditional velocity-azimuth-display (VAD) technique, estimates the wind speed and direction measurement precision using standard error propagation techniques, assuming the input data (i.e., radial velocities) to be contaminated by random, zero-mean, errors. For this study, the lidar was configured to execute an 8-beam plan-position-indicator (PPI) scan once every 12min during the 6-week deployment period. Several wind retrieval trials were conducted using different schemes for estimating the precision in the radial velocity measurements. The resulting wind speed and direction precision estimates were compared to differences in wind speed and direction between the VAD algorithm and sonic anemometer measurements taken on a nearby 300m tower.

All trials produced qualitatively similar wind fields with negligible bias but substantially different wind speed and direction precision fields. The most accurate wind speed and direction precisions were obtained when the radial velocity precision was determined by direct calculation of radial velocity standard deviation along each pointing direction and range gate of the PPI scan. By contrast, when the instrumental measurement precision is assumed to be the only contribution to the radial velocity precision, the retrievals resulted in wind speed and direction precisions that were biased far too low and were poor indicators of data quality.

Please read the corrigendum first before accessing the article.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Notice on corrigendum

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Doppler lidars are remote sensing instruments that use infrared light to measure wind velocity in the lowest 2 to 3 km of the atmosphere. Quantifying the uncertainty in these measurements is crucial for applications ranging from wind resource assessment to model data assimilation. In this study, we evaluate three methods for estimating the random uncertainty by comparing the lidar wind measurements with nearly collocated in situ wind measurements at multiple levels on a tall tower.
Doppler lidars are remote sensing instruments that use infrared light to measure wind velocity...
Citation
Share