Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 10, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1803-1812, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1803-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1803-1812, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1803-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 16 May 2017

Research article | 16 May 2017

Comparison of optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy and gas chromatography for ground-based and airborne measurements of atmospheric CO concentration

Irène Ventrillard et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,780 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,277 457 46 1,780 45 70
  • HTML: 1,277
  • PDF: 457
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 1,780
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 70
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2016)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,786 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,771 with geography defined and 15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Jul 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present a comparison of CO measurements performed with a portable OF-CEAS laser spectrometer against a high-performance gas chromatograph. For both surface and airborne measurements, the instruments show an excellent agreement very close to the 2 ppb World Meteorological Organization recommendation for CO inter-laboratory comparison. This work establishes that this laser technique allows for the development of sensitive, compact, robust and reliable instruments for in situ trace-gas analysis.
We present a comparison of CO measurements performed with a portable OF-CEAS laser spectrometer...
Citation