Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2851-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2851-2017
Research article
 | 
11 Aug 2017
Research article |  | 11 Aug 2017

Intercomparison of atmospheric water vapour measurements at a Canadian High Arctic site

Dan Weaver, Kimberly Strong, Matthias Schneider, Penny M. Rowe, Chris Sioris, Kaley A. Walker, Zen Mariani, Taneil Uttal, C. Thomas McElroy, Holger Vömel, Alessio Spassiani, and James R. Drummond

Viewed

Total article views: 3,136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,028 1,013 95 3,136 278 121 111
  • HTML: 2,028
  • PDF: 1,013
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 3,136
  • Supplement: 278
  • BibTeX: 121
  • EndNote: 111
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Nov 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,046 with geography defined and 90 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We have compared techniques used by several PEARL instruments to measure atmospheric water vapour. No single instrument can comprehensively map the atmosphere. We documented how well these techniques perform and quantified the agreement and biases between them. This work showed that new FTIR datasets at PEARL capture accurate measurements of High Arctic water vapour.