Intercomparison of open-path trace gas measurements with two dual-frequency-comb spectrometers

Waxman, Eleanor M.; Cossel, Kevin C.; Truong, Gar-Wing; Giorgetta, Fabrizio R.; Swann, William C.; Coburn, Sean; Wright, Robert J.; Rieker, Gregory B.; Coddington, Ian; Newbury, Nathan R.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3295-2017

Articles | Volume 10, issue 9

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3295-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3295-2017

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 10, issue 9

Research article

|

11 Sep 2017

Research article |

| 11 Sep 2017

Intercomparison of open-path trace gas measurements with two dual-frequency-comb spectrometers

Eleanor M. Waxman, Kevin C. Cossel, Gar-Wing Truong, Fabrizio R. Giorgetta, William C. Swann, Sean Coburn, Robert J. Wright, Gregory B. Rieker, Ian Coddington, and Nathan R. Newbury

Download

Final revised paper (published on 11 Sep 2017)
Preprint (discussion started on 14 Mar 2017)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Report of amt-2017-62', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Apr 2017
RC2: 'Review report of amt-2017-62', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Jun 2017
AC1: 'Reply to Editor and Reviewer Comments', Eleanor Waxman, 28 Jun 2017

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Eleanor Waxman on behalf of the Authors (28 Jun 2017) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Jul 2017) by Huilin Chen

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (18 Jul 2017)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (03 Aug 2017) by Huilin Chen

Short summary

In this paper, we compare greenhouse gas measurements from two novel open-path instruments to determine how similarly they measure the same gas concentration. We do this over an outdoor path, so the two instruments measured the same outdoor air. We found that the two instruments agree extremely well, so in the future if the instruments were at two different locations we could reliably compare their measurements to determine differences between the two places.