Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4001-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4001-2017
Research article
 | 
27 Oct 2017
Research article |  | 27 Oct 2017

The effects of different footprint sizes and cloud algorithms on the top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from the Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument on Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP)

Wenying Su, Lusheng Liang, Walter F. Miller, and Victor E. Sothcott

Related authors

Next-generation radiance unfiltering process for the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System instrument
Lusheng Liang, Wenying Su, Sergio Sejas, Zachary Eitzen, and Norman G. Loeb
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2147–2163, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2147-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2147-2024, 2024
Short summary
Determining the daytime Earth radiative flux from National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Radiometer (NISTAR) measurements
Wenying Su, Patrick Minnis, Lusheng Liang, David P. Duda, Konstantin Khlopenkov, Mandana M. Thieman, Yinan Yu, Allan Smith, Steven Lorentz, Daniel Feldman, and Francisco P. J. Valero
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 429–443, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-429-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-429-2020, 2020
Short summary
Cloud products from the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC): algorithms and initial evaluation
Yuekui Yang, Kerry Meyer, Galina Wind, Yaping Zhou, Alexander Marshak, Steven Platnick, Qilong Min, Anthony B. Davis, Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, David Duda, and Wenying Su
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2019–2031, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2019-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2019-2019, 2019
Short summary
Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: validation
W. Su, J. Corbett, Z. Eitzen, and L. Liang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3297–3313, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3297-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3297-2015, 2015
Accounting for the effects of sastrugi in the CERES clear-sky Antarctic shortwave angular distribution models
J. Corbett and W. Su
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3163–3175, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3163-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3163-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
A cloud-by-cloud approach for studying aerosol–cloud interaction in satellite observations
Fani Alexandri, Felix Müller, Goutam Choudhury, Peggy Achtert, Torsten Seelig, and Matthias Tesche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1739–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Geometrical and optical properties of cirrus clouds in Barcelona, Spain: analysis with the two-way transmittance method of 4 years of lidar measurements
Cristina Gil-Díaz, Michäel Sicard, Adolfo Comerón, Daniel Camilo Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Jasper R. Lewis, Ellsworth J. Welton, and Simone Lolli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1197–1216, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Determination of the vertical distribution of in-cloud particle shape using SLDR-mode 35 GHz scanning cloud radar
Audrey Teisseire, Patric Seifert, Alexander Myagkov, Johannes Bühl, and Martin Radenz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 999–1016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-999-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-999-2024, 2024
Short summary
Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived 3D cloud tomography from geostationary 2D satellite data
Sarah Brüning, Stefan Niebler, and Holger Tost
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 961–978, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-961-2024, 2024
Short summary
The EarthCARE mission: science data processing chain overview
Michael Eisinger, Fabien Marnas, Kotska Wallace, Takuji Kubota, Nobuhiro Tomiyama, Yuichi Ohno, Toshiyuki Tanaka, Eichi Tomita, Tobias Wehr, and Dirk Bernaerts
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 839–862, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-839-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-839-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Di Girolamo, L., Varnai, T., and Davies, R. D.: Apparent breakdown of reciprocity in reflected solar radiances, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8795–8803, 1998.
Kato, S., Rose, F. G., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., Chen, Y., Rutan, D. A., Stephens, G. L., Loeb, N. G., Minnis, P., Wielicki, B. A., Winker, D. M., Charlock, T. P., Stackhouse Jr., P. W., Xu, K.-M., and Collins, W. D.: Improvements of top-of-atmosphere and surface irradiance computation with CALIPSO-, and MODIS-derived cloud and aerosol properties, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016050, 2011.
Loeb, N. G. and Manalo-Smith, N.: Top-of-atmosphere direct radiative effect of aerosols over global oceans from merged CERES and MODIS observations, J. Climate, 18, 3506–3526, 2005.
Loeb, N. G. and Schuster, G. L.: An observational study of the relationship between cloud, aerosol and meteorology in broken low-level cloud conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009763, 2008.
Loeb, N. G., Manalo-Smith, N., Kato, S., Miller, W. F., Gupta, S. K., Minnis, P., and Wielicki, B. A.: Angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System instrument on the tropical rainfall measuring mission satellite. Part I: methodology, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 240–265, 2003.
Download
Short summary
The footprint size of NPP CERES is larger than that of Aqua CERES, because the altitude of the NPP orbit is higher than that of the Aqua orbit. Additionally, the cloud retrievals from VIIRS and MODIS, the imagers that fly alongside NPP CERES and Aqua CERES, are also different. This paper outlined a simulation study using the MODIS pixel-level data to address the impact of these differences on the NPP CERES fluxes inverted using the Aqua CERES angular distribution models.