Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Volume 11, issue 2 | Copyright

Special issue: Sources, propagation, dissipation and impact of gravity waves...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1031-1048, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1031-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 22 Feb 2018

Research article | 22 Feb 2018

An intercomparison of stratospheric gravity wave potential energy densities from METOP GPS radio occultation measurements and ECMWF model data

Markus Rapp et al.
Related authors
Gravity waves excited during a minor sudden stratospheric warming
Andreas Dörnbrack, Sonja Gisinger, Natalie Kaifler, Tanja Christina Portele, Martina Bramberger, Markus Rapp, Michael Gerding, Jens Söder, Nedjeljka Žagar, and Damjan Jelić
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12915-12931, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12915-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12915-2018, 2018
High-resolution vertical velocities and their power spectrum observed with the MAARSY radar – Part 1: frequency spectrum
Qiang Li, Markus Rapp, Gunter Stober, and Ralph Latteck
Ann. Geophys., 36, 577-586, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-577-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-577-2018, 2018
First tomographic observations of gravity waves by the infrared limb imager GLORIA
Isabell Krisch, Peter Preusse, Jörn Ungermann, Andreas Dörnbrack, Stephen D. Eckermann, Manfred Ern, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Martin Kaufmann, Hermann Oelhaf, Markus Rapp, Cornelia Strube, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14937-14953, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14937-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14937-2017, 2017
Mountain waves modulate the water vapor distribution in the UTLS
Romy Heller, Christiane Voigt, Stuart Beaton, Andreas Dörnbrack, Andreas Giez, Stefan Kaufmann, Christian Mallaun, Hans Schlager, Johannes Wagner, Kate Young, and Markus Rapp
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14853-14869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14853-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14853-2017, 2017
Estimate of size distribution of charged MSPs measured in situ in winter during the WADIS-2 sounding rocket campaign
Heiner Asmus, Tristan Staszak, Boris Strelnikov, Franz-Josef Lübken, Martin Friedrich, and Markus Rapp
Ann. Geophys., 35, 979-998, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-979-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-979-2017, 2017
Related subject area
Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Enhancing the consistency of spaceborne and ground-based radar comparisons by using beam blockage fraction as a quality filter
Irene Crisologo, Robert A. Warren, Kai Mühlbauer, and Maik Heistermann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5223-5236, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5223-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5223-2018, 2018
Rainfall retrieval with commercial microwave links in São Paulo, Brazil
Manuel F. Rios Gaona, Aart Overeem, Timothy H. Raupach, Hidde Leijnse, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4465-4476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4465-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4465-2018, 2018
Evaluating two methods of estimating error variances using simulated data sets with known errors
Therese Rieckh and Richard Anthes
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4309-4325, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4309-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4309-2018, 2018
Estimation of turbulence dissipation rate and its variability from sonic anemometer and wind Doppler lidar during the XPIA field campaign
Nicola Bodini, Julie K. Lundquist, and Rob K. Newsom
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4291-4308, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4291-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4291-2018, 2018
Inter-channel uniformity of a microwave sounder in space
Martin Burgdorf, Imke Hans, Marc Prange, Theresa Lang, and Stefan A. Buehler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4005-4014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4005-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4005-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Alexander, M. J., Geller, M., McLandress, C., Polavarapu, S., Preusse, P., Sassi, F., Sato, K., Eckermann, S. D., Ern, M., Hertzog, A., Kawatani, Y. A., Pulido, M., Shaw, T., Sigmond, M., Vincent, R., and Watanabe, S.: Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1103–1124, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637, 2010.
Birner, T., Dörnbrack, A., and Schumann, U.: How sharp is the tropopause at midlatitudes?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1700, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015142, 2002.
Birner, T., Sankey, D., and Shepherd, T. G.: The tropopause inversion layer in models and analyses, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L14804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026549, 2006.
Bölöni, G., Ribstein, B., Muraschko, J., Sgoff, C., Wei, J., and Achatz, U.: The interaction between atmospheric gravity waves and large-scale flows: an efficient description beyond the non-acceleration paradigm, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4833–4852, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
Temperature profiles from operational weather satellites are used to determine the global distribution of gravity wave activity. This is an important information to constrain global climate models. The quality of this data set is assessed by systematic comparison to model fields from ECMWF which are considered very high quality. This reveals good agreement between model and observations, albeit the model misses localized centers of wave activity if model resolution is too low.
Temperature profiles from operational weather satellites are used to determine the global...
Citation
Share