Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 11, issue 2
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1119–1141, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1119-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: EARLINET, the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1119–1141, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1119-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 26 Feb 2018

Research article | 26 Feb 2018

Experimental techniques for the calibration of lidar depolarization channels in EARLINET

Livio Belegante et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,361 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
808 501 52 1,361 37 40
  • HTML: 808
  • PDF: 501
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 1,361
  • BibTeX: 37
  • EndNote: 40
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,271 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper presents different depolarization calibration procedures used to improve the quality of the depolarization data. The results illustrate a significant improvement of the depolarization lidar products for all the selected EARLINET lidar instruments. The calibrated volume and particle depolarization profiles at 532 nm show values that fall within a range that is accepted in the literature. The depolarization accuracy estimate at 532 nm is better than ±0.03 for all cases.
This paper presents different depolarization calibration procedures used to improve the quality...
Citation