Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.089 IF 3.089
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.700 IF 5-year
    3.700
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.59 CiteScore
    3.59
  • SNIP value: 1.273 SNIP 1.273
  • SJR value: 2.026 SJR 2.026
  • IPP value: 3.082 IPP 3.082
  • h5-index value: 45 h5-index 45
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1777-1792, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
28 Mar 2018
Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors
Kira Sadighi1, Evan Coffey1, Andrea Polidori2, Brandon Feenstra2, Qin Lv3, Daven K. Henze1, and Michael Hannigan1 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 427 UCB, 1111 Engineering Drive, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
2South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Sensor Performance Evaluation Center, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178, USA
3Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, 430 UCB, 1111 Engineering Drive, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Abstract. Sensor networks are being more widely used to characterize and understand compounds in the atmosphere like ozone (O3). This study employs a measurement tool, called the U-Pod, constructed at the University of Colorado Boulder, to investigate spatial and temporal variability of O3 in a 200 km2 area of Riverside County near Los Angeles, California. This tool contains low-cost sensors to collect ambient data at non-permanent locations. The U-Pods were calibrated using a pre-deployment field calibration technique; all the U-Pods were collocated with regulatory monitors. After collocation, the U-Pods were deployed in the area mentioned. A subset of pods was deployed at two local regulatory air quality monitoring stations providing validation for the collocation calibration method. Field validation of sensor O3 measurements to minute-resolution reference observations resulted in R2 and root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 0.95–0.97 and 4.4–5.9 ppbv, respectively. Using the deployment data, ozone concentrations were observed to vary on this small spatial scale. In the analysis based on hourly binned data, the median R2 values between all possible U-Pod pairs varied from 0.52 to 0.86 for ozone during the deployment. The medians of absolute differences were calculated between all possible pod pairs, 21 pairs total. The median values of those median absolute differences for each hour of the day varied between 2.2 and 9.3 ppbv for the ozone deployment. Since median differences between U-Pod concentrations during deployment are larger than the respective root mean square error values, we can conclude that there is spatial variability in this criteria pollutant across the study area. This is important because it means that citizens may be exposed to more, or less, ozone than they would assume based on current regulatory monitoring.
Citation: Sadighi, K., Coffey, E., Polidori, A., Feenstra, B., Lv, Q., Henze, D. K., and Hannigan, M.: Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1777-1792, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018, 2018.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Ground-level ozone has negative human health impacts. In the summer of 2015, 13 low-cost sensor monitors were deployed to several neighborhoods around Riverside, California. There were significant spatial differences between monitors. This is important because it means that ozone in certain places may be higher than what EPA monitors report for an area, which is pertinent for residents of those communities. This research helps inform the limitations and advantages of low-cost sensor networks.
Ground-level ozone has negative human health impacts. In the summer of 2015, 13 low-cost sensor...
Share