Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3645-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3645-2018
Research article
 | 
25 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 25 Jun 2018

Laboratory and in-flight evaluation of measurement uncertainties from a commercial Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP)

Spencer Faber, Jeffrey R. French, and Robert Jackson

Related authors

tobac v1.5: Introducing Fast 3D Tracking, Splits and Mergers, and Other Enhancements for Identifying and Analysing Meteorological Phenomena
G. Alexander Sokolowsky, Sean W. Freeman, William K. Jones, Julia Kukulies, Fabian Senf, Peter J. Marinescu, Max Heikenfeld, Kelcy N. Brunner, Eric C. Bruning, Scott M. Collis, Robert C. Jackson, Gabrielle R. Leung, Nils Pfeifer, Bhupendra A. Raut, Stephen M. Saleeby, Philip Stier, and Susan C. van den Heever
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1722,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1722, 2023
Short summary
Optimizing cloud motion estimation on the edge with phase correlation and optical flow
Bhupendra A. Raut, Paytsar Muradyan, Rajesh Sankaran, Robert C. Jackson, Seongha Park, Sean A. Shahkarami, Dario Dematties, Yongho Kim, Joseph Swantek, Neal Conrad, Wolfgang Gerlach, Sergey Shemyakin, Pete Beckman, Nicola J. Ferrier, and Scott M. Collis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1195–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1195-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1195-2023, 2023
Short summary
In situ microphysics observations of intense pyroconvection from a large wildfire
David E. Kingsmill, Jeffrey R. French, and Neil P. Lareau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
The Earth Model Column Collaboratory (EMC2) v1.1: an open-source ground-based lidar and radar instrument simulator and subcolumn generator for large-scale models
Israel Silber, Robert C. Jackson, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Scott Collis, Johannes Verlinde, and Jiachen Ding
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 901–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, 2022
Short summary
The development of rainfall retrievals from radar at Darwin
Robert Jackson, Scott Collis, Valentin Louf, Alain Protat, Die Wang, Scott Giangrande, Elizabeth J. Thompson, Brenda Dolan, and Scott W. Powell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 53–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-53-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-53-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Applicability of the low-cost OPC-N3 optical particle counter for microphysical measurements of fog
Katarzyna Nurowska, Moein Mohammadi, Szymon Malinowski, and Krzysztof Markowicz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2415–2430, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
A study of optical scattering modelling for mixed-phase polar stratospheric clouds
Francesco Cairo, Terry Deshler, Luca Di Liberto, Andrea Scoccione, and Marcel Snels
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 419–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-419-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-419-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technique for comparison of backscatter coefficients derived from in situ cloud probe measurements with concurrent airborne lidar
Shawn Wendell Wagner and David James Delene
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6447–6466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of holographic imaging and single-particle forward light scattering in situ measurements of liquid clouds in changing atmospheric conditions
Petri Tiitta, Ari Leskinen, Ville A. Kaikkonen, Eero O. Molkoselkä, Anssi J. Mäkynen, Jorma Joutsensaari, Silvia Calderon, Sami Romakkaniemi, and Mika Komppula
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2993–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2993-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2993-2022, 2022
Short summary
Design and field campaign validation of a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle and optical particle counter
Joseph Girdwood, Helen Smith, Warren Stanley, Zbigniew Ulanowski, Chris Stopford, Charles Chemel, Konstantinos-Matthaios Doulgeris, David Brus, David Campbell, and Robert Mackenzie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6613–6630, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6613-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6613-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abel, S. J., Cotton, R. J., Barrett, P. A., and Vance, A. K.: A comparison of ice water content measurement techniques on the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3007–3022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3007-2014, 2014. 
Baumgardner, D., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Cotton, R., Crosier, J., Field, P., Gurganus, C., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Kramer, M., Lawson, P., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Um, J.: Cloud Ice Properties: In Situ Measurement Challenges, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 9.1–9.23, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0011.1, 2017 
Baumgardner, D. and Spowart, M.: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe, Part III: Time Response and Laser Imhomogeneity Limitations, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7, 666–672, 1990. 
Baumgardner, D., Strapp, J. W., and Dye J. E.: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe, Part II: Corrections for Coincidence and Dead-Time Losses, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 2, 626–632, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1985)002<0626:EOTFSS>2.0.CO;2, 1985. 
Brenguier, J. L., Baumgardner, D., and Baker, B.: A review and discussion of processing algorithms for FSSP concentration measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 11, 1409–1414, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1409:ARADOP>2.0.CO;2, 1994. 
Download
Short summary
Laboratory and in-flight evaluations of uncertainties of measurements from a cloud droplet probe are presented. This study extends results of earlier studies by examining instrument response over a greater range of droplet sizes throughout the entire sample volume. Errors in droplet sizing based on the laboratory measurements tend to be less than 10 %, significantly less than typically quoted sizing accuracy for this class of instrument.