Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3871–3882, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3871-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3871–3882, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3871-2018

Research article 03 Jul 2018

Research article | 03 Jul 2018

# Characterization of blackbody inhomogeneity and its effect on the retrieval results of the GLORIA instrument

Characterization of blackbody inhomogeneity and its effect on the retrieval results of the GLORIA instrument
Anne Kleinert1, Isabell Krisch2, Jörn Ungermann2, Albert Adibekyan3, Berndt Gutschwager3, and Christian Monte3 Anne Kleinert et al.
• 1Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK-ASF), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Karlsruhe, Germany
• 2Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Stratosphäre (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
• 3Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence: Anne Kleinert (anne.kleinert@kit.edu)

Abstract

Limb sounding instruments play an important role in the monitoring of climate trends, as they provide a good vertical resolution. Traceability to the International System of Units (SI) via onboard reference or transfer standards is needed to compare trend estimates from multiple instruments. This study investigates the required uncertainty of these radiation standards to properly resolve decadal trends of climate-relevant trace species like ozone, water vapor, and temperature distribution for the Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA). Temperature nonuniformities of the onboard reference blackbodies, used for radiometric calibration, have an impact on the calibration uncertainty. The propagation of these nonuniformities through the retrieval is analyzed. A threshold for the maximum tolerable uncertainty of the blackbody temperature is derived, so that climate trends can be significantly identified with GLORIA.

1 Introduction

Remote sensing from satellites is crucial for a better monitoring of the Earth system, as only in this way can a global data set covering remote regions be provided. Trace gas profiles with high vertical resolution are provided by limb sounders. Currently, limb satellites for observing the upper troposphere and stratosphere (UTS) are operating beyond design lifetime (e.g., SABER; or ACE; ) or have already ceased their service (e.g., MIPAS; ). No new limb satellite mission has been approved thus far. Thus a gap of observations of the UTS with high altitude resolution is foreseeable. This will lead to interruptions in atmospheric trend monitoring. The Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA; ), an airborne Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS), can help to fill the gap. Furthermore, it makes a comparison of current satellite instruments with future ones possible, as it can provide reference measurements now and in the future.

Several climate-relevant species like ozone and water vapor, as well as the atmospheric temperature, can be retrieved from GLORIA measurements. To measure continuous climate trends with different instruments, the measurements have to be traceable to the International System of Units (SI) via radiation standards. The present study aims to provide an uncertainty threshold for the radiation standards used for the calibration of the GLORIA instrument. This threshold value will be based on the requirement to resolve typical trends of atmospheric species like ozone, water vapor, and temperature.

After an introduction to the GLORIA instrument and the radiometric calibration approach in Sect. 2, we investigate the impact of blackbody temperature uncertainties on retrieval results in Sect. 3, taking various types of blackbody nonuniformities into account. In Sect. 4, we present characterization results of the GLORIA calibration blackbodies in terms of absolute temperature uncertainties and nonuniformities. As an example, we apply these uncertainties to actual GLORIA measurements and derive the resulting retrieval error. All uncertainties given in the text shall be understood as 1σ values if not indicated otherwise.

2 The GLORIA instrument

## 2.1 Measurement principle

GLORIA is an airborne FTS for measuring atmospheric emission in the thermal infrared spectral range from 780 to 1400 cm−1. GLORIA combines a classical Michelson interferometer with a 2-D detector array. The infrared radiation emitted by molecular vibrational and rotational bands along the line of sight (LOS) is measured (Fig. 1). The interferometer spectrally resolves this radiation to reveal characteristic emission and absorption bands.

GLORIA operates in two different modes, the dynamics mode and the chemistry mode. The chemistry mode has a high spectral sampling of 0.0625 cm−1, whereas the dynamics mode operates on a coarser spectral sampling of 0.625 cm−1. This coarser spectral sampling allows for faster interferogram acquisition and thus an improved spatial resolution along the flight track. From the intensities of the measured spectrally resolved radiation, atmospheric parameters like temperature and a variety of trace gases can be retrieved. A detailed description of the GLORIA measurement concept can be found in .

The LOS of limb instruments is directed towards the limb of the Earth's atmosphere; hence, a good vertical resolution is achieved. With the 2-D detector array 128×128 spectra can be measured simultaneously in the range from 5 km up to flight altitude. Typical images are narrowed to 48×128 (width × height) in favor of a shorter readout time. The horizontal imaging capability is currently not used for temperature and trace gas retrievals. Instead, the signal over each row is averaged to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, and bad pixels are filtered prior to averaging. The vertical profiles are thus retrieved from a 1×128 array. The standard viewing direction of GLORIA is 90 to the flight direction, such that 2-D distributions of atmospheric parameters are measured along the flight path of the aircraft. Furthermore, GLORIA is able to pan the LOS from 45 to 135 azimuth. This allows for tomographic retrievals in order to acquire 3-D images of atmospheric features . The ability to pan the LOS is also used to point the FTS towards the two calibration blackbodies. The main steps from raw measurements to vertical temperature and trace gas profiles are illustrated in Fig. 2.

## 2.2 Radiometric calibration

The GLORIA measurements in arbitrary intensity units have to be radiometrically calibrated to absolute radiances. Two onboard calibration sources are used to estimate a unique gain and offset for each detector pixel. The two-point calibration approach requires a linear detector response or a correction of any nonlinear behavior of the detector system prior to radiometric calibration.

Figure 1The viewing geometry of a limb sounder .

Figure 2Brief illustration of the GLORIA data processing. (a) Raw single image of the detector array. (b) Set of 128 radiometrically and spectrally calibrated spectra representing one measurement. (c) Vertical profile of H2O (courtesy: Wolfgang Woiwode, KIT).

The radiometric in-flight calibration uses two blackbodies at different temperatures . They are mounted outside of the spectrometer, such that the whole optical path including the entrance window is calibrated. In order to cover the field of view (FOV) of the whole detector array, they have a rather large optical surface area of 126 mm× 126 mm. Since a revision of the blackbody design in 2015, the emitting back-surface of the blackbody consists of 25 by 25 pyramids of 8 mm height. The backplane is wire eroded of one solid piece of aluminum for a good thermal conductivity. It features light traps at the bases of the pyramids to effectively avoid direct reflection of any incoming radiation and to increase the emissivity.

The pyramids and the casing are varnished with NEXTEL Velvet Coating 811-21. This design leads to an emissivity of better than 0.997 (see Sect. 4.1 below). Four thermoelectric coolers (TECs), which provide the options of cooling and heating, are used to stabilize the temperature of each blackbody. The baseplate of the pyramid array is equipped with 10 platinum resistance thermometers (PRTs) calibrated with a temperature uncertainty of 10 mK. The electronics measuring the resistance have an uncertainty of about 15 to 20 , corresponding to a temperature uncertainty of about 50 mK. Four of these sensors are placed directly under the TECs and are used to control the heating or cooling rate. The other six sensors are used for monitoring. The temperature of the cold blackbody is stabilized at or slightly below the ambient temperature (typically around 230 to 250 K), the hot blackbody is heated to 30 to 40 K above the cold one. In order to avoid ice contamination and to suppress stray light, a baffle is mounted in front of the casing of each blackbody. The baffle is cooled with two TECs to 2 K below the temperature of the pyramid array. The blackbodies are insulated with polystyrene foam sheets and the baffle system is thermally decoupled from the pyramid section with a layer of glass-fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP). A sketch of the blackbodies is given in Fig. 3.

The gain and offset of an instrument are defined as the multiplicative (gain, g) and additive (offset, L0) factors, which must be applied to the true radiation L, in order to get the signal measured by the instrument S (Revercomb et al.1988):

$\begin{array}{}\text{(1)}& S=g\left(L+{L}_{\mathrm{0}}\right).\end{array}$

Figure 3Design of the GLORIA calibration blackbodies (courtesy: Friedhelm Olschewski, BUW, Germany).

These factors differ for each pixel and wavelength. Gain and offset can be determined from measurements of two blackbody sources with known temperature. Assuming an emissivity of 1, the gain is calculated as

$\begin{array}{}\text{(2)}& g=\frac{{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}-{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right)}\end{array}$

and the offset as

$\begin{array}{}\text{(3)}& {L}_{\mathrm{0}}=\frac{{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{g}-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right),\end{array}$

with B(T) being the Planck function of the given temperature. The effect of a non-perfect emissivity is discussed in Sect. 4. More details on the calibration concept of GLORIA are given by and .

The calibrated spectral radiation L can be calculated from the measurements by dividing the measured radiation S by the gain g and subtracting the offset L0.

$\begin{array}{}\text{(4)}& L=\frac{S}{g}-{L}_{\mathrm{0}}\end{array}$

## 2.3 Impact of blackbody temperature uncertainty on radiances

The surface area of the backplane of the GLORIA blackbodies with a size of 126 mm× 126 mm is rather large. It is a technically challenging task to get a completely uniform temperature distribution over this big area. In reality, the temperature varies across the blackbody due to thermal gradients inside the backplane, the air flow around the pyramids, and an imperfect temperature regulation.

If the true blackbody temperature ${T}_{\mathrm{bb}}^{t}={T}_{\mathrm{bb}}-\mathrm{\Delta }{T}_{\mathrm{bb}}$ deviates from Tbb, which is used for calculating g and L0, the true gain gt and true offset ${L}_{\mathrm{0}}^{t}$ differ from g and L0 as follows:

$\begin{array}{}\text{(5)}& {g}^{t}=\frac{{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}-{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}^{t}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)}=g\mathit{\alpha }\end{array}$

with

$\begin{array}{}\text{(6)}& \mathit{\alpha }=\frac{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right)}{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{2}}^{t}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)}\end{array}$

and

$\begin{array}{}\text{(7)}& {L}_{\mathrm{0}}^{t}=\frac{{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{{g}^{t}}-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right).\end{array}$

This leads to a deviation ΔL of the originally calculated calibrated radiation L from the true calibrated radiation Lt. The calibrated spectra can be expressed in terms of the “true” calibrated spectra ${L}^{t}=S/{g}^{t}-{L}_{\mathrm{0}}^{t}$:

$\begin{array}{}\text{(8)}& L& =\frac{S}{g}-{L}_{\mathrm{0}},\text{(9)}& & =\frac{S-{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{{g}^{t}}\mathit{\alpha }+B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right),\text{(10)}& & =\left(\frac{S-{S}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}}{{g}^{t}}+B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)\right)\mathit{\alpha }+B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right),\text{(11)}& & =\left({L}^{t}-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)\right)\mathit{\alpha }+B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right).\end{array}$

Thus, the deviation ΔL is

$\begin{array}{}\text{(12)}& \mathrm{\Delta }L& =L-{L}^{t},\text{(13)}& & ={L}^{t}\left(\mathit{\alpha }-\mathrm{1}\right)-B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}^{t}\right)\mathit{\alpha }+B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}\mathrm{1}}\right).\end{array}$

This deviation is a combination of a scaling compared to the true calibrated measurements and an additive offset.

If one blackbody measurement is replaced by a deep space measurement, the deviation simplifies to a simple scaling of the true calibrated measurements:

$\begin{array}{}\text{(14)}& \mathrm{\Delta }{L}^{\mathrm{bb},\mathrm{ds}}={L}^{t}\left(\frac{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}}\right)}{B\left({T}_{\mathrm{bb}}^{t}\right)}-\mathrm{1}\right),\end{array}$

as the emission of deep space can be assumed to be effectively zero.

## 2.4 Other sources of uncertainty

Uncertainties in the gain function come not only from uncertainties of the temperature and emissivity of the blackbody but also from uncertainties in the determination of the detector nonlinearity and the instrument self-emission (offset). These uncertainties are currently estimated to about 2–3 % (k=2), with k being the uncertainty coverage factor (see, e.g., https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Uncertainty/coverage.html, last access: 12 June 2018). Further characterization is under way in order to reduce these uncertainties in future processing versions.

Beside the uncertainties in the calibrated spectra, the quality of the retrieval results also relies on the quality of the spectroscopic data and the impact of interfering species in the selected microwindows. Spectroscopic uncertainties are, however, systematic over time and cancel out in case of trend analyses. Furthermore, the quality of the spectroscopic data may improve in the future. Some interfering species impose uncertainties within the troposphere in the same order as the blackbody inhomogeneity. Further improvements on the retrieval are likely able to reduce these.

With the current data processing and retrieval setup, the blackbody temperature uncertainties are estimated to be one of the leading sources of uncertainty, together with other uncertainties in the gain determination and the impact of interfering species. Since the other major sources of uncertainty are expected to be reduced with better instrument characterization and an optimized retrieval setup, the focus of this study is on the impact of the blackbody temperature uncertainties on the retrieval results relevant for the detection of climate-relevant trends.

Figure 4Random temperature deviations for the 128 vertical detector pixels with different correlation lengths c. The temperature deviations in panel (a) have a correlation length of one vertical pixel, meaning that they are nearly uncorrelated. In contrast the temperature deviations in panel (c) are nearly fully correlated over the whole detector (correlation length of 128 pixels). In panel (b) a correlation length of 20 pixels is depicted. All variations have a standard deviation of σ=0.2. The gray shade marks the 3σ area.

3 Impact of blackbody temperature uncertainties on retrieval results

## 3.1 Study concept

A Monte Carlo approach (Metropolis and Ulam1949; Press1968) is used for this part of the study. Therefore, many random temperature fluctuations of the blackbodies are generated and the effects of these fluctuations on the retrieved climate variables are calculated. Afterwards, statistical information on the perturbed retrieval results is derived. Only vertical temperature variations are taken into account, as the row averaged radiation is used for the standard GLORIA retrievals (see Sect. 2.1). Consequently, a random temperature deviation is created for each vertical pixel around the measured mean blackbody temperature Tbb. These deviations ΔTbb are defined over the detector through the covariance matrix COV with standard deviation σ and correlation length c:

$\begin{array}{}\text{(15)}& \mathbf{COV}\left(i,j\right)={\mathit{\sigma }}^{\mathrm{2}}\cdot {e}^{-\frac{\mathrm{1}}{\mathrm{2}}\cdot {\left(\frac{i-j}{c}\right)}^{\mathrm{2}}},\end{array}$

with i and j denoting the 128 averaged rows of the detector. Examples for these temperature deviations ΔTbb are shown in Fig. 4 for different correlation lengths. A correlation length of 0 means completely uncorrelated deviations and infinity completely correlated (i.e., constant) ones. Due to the optical setup and the thermal conductivity of the blackbody surface, typical correlation lengths of the GLORIA blackbodies are expected to be in the range of 10 to 100 pixels. Temperature variations across the emitting surface have to be rather smooth because of the thermal conductivity of the material. Furthermore, the instrument is focused to infinity and the picture of the blackbody backplane on the detector is not sharp. Therefore correlation lengths below 10 pixels are not expected.

For each pair of standard deviation and correlation length, 256 random temperature distributions are generated. These blackbody temperature deviations transform into radiation deviation distributions ΔL according to Eq. (14).

This study uses atmospheric profiles from a climatology in the mid-latitudes to simulate infrared spectra as they would be measured by GLORIA at 15 km flight altitude. The GLORIA Measurement Simulator uses vertical profiles of relevant trace species and of pressure and temperature from the climatology and combines them in a forward model with the GLORIA measurement geometry. This results in one infrared spectrum for each of the 128 vertical pixels. Typical noise values of the GLORIA instrument are added to these spectra. These synthetic measurements are transferred back into the geophysical quantities of temperature and trace gas volume mixing ratios according to the retrieval setup described in for the GLORIA dynamics mode. A gain matrix G is calculated in this retrieval process, which correlates measurement deviations (ΔL) with retrieval result uncertainties (Δx). As the radiation errors caused by the blackbody inhomogeneities are small compared to the simulated radiations, the retrieval can be linearized and the retrieval gain matrix G can be assumed to be constant for the small deviations ΔL around the original radiation (Rodgers2000). Therefore, the influence of the blackbody temperature deviations on the retrieval result of atmospheric trace gases and temperature can be calculated as follows:

$\begin{array}{}\text{(16)}& \mathbf{G}\cdot \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbit{L}=\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbit{x}.\end{array}$

The retrieval uncertainty distribution is estimated through a fit of a Gaussian shaped probability distribution to the 256 Δx vectors of each pair of correlation length and standard deviation of the original ΔTbb distribution. This allows us to estimate a standard deviation and a correlation length of the retrieval uncertainty probability distribution. The results are presented in Sect. 3.2.

Figure 5Results of the Monte Carlo approach. Plotted are the standard deviations (a) and correlations lengths (b) of the retrieval error distributions. The x axis shows the standard deviation of the original random variation of the blackbody temperature and the y axis shows the according correlation length. The top row represents the temperature retrieval, in the middle ozone is shown, and the bottom depicts water vapor. The black solid (dashed) line in the left plots indicates the error target (threshold) due to the long-term trend of the respective atmospheric species.

## 3.2 Study results and discussion

The measurement uncertainty of GLORIA should ideally be small compared to the decadal trends. We therefore choose a target and a threshold value for the accuracy of 20 and 40 % of the decadal trends, respectively. Table 1 shows the decadal trends in temperature, ozone, and water vapor together with the resulting target and threshold values for these entities.

As described in Sect. 3.1, a Monte Carlo approach is used to estimate the propagation of temperature nonuniformities of the blackbody surface through the retrieval. Figure 5 shows the results of this study. The standard deviations and correlation lengths of the retrieval errors are displayed for different standard deviations and correlation lengths of the random deviations of the blackbody temperature. These retrieval errors are averaged over the altitude range 7–14 km.

As expected, the correlation length of the retrieval error increases with the correlation length of the input for all species (see right panels in Fig. 5). For all species shown, the correlation lengths of the retrieval errors are around 1–1.5 km for blackbody nonuniformities correlated over less than 50 pixels. For temperature deviations over larger areas, the correlation lengths in the retrieval errors grow accordingly. These more extended errors introduce a bias in the measurements but do not influence the general structures of the measured species. For some scientific uses, such as gravity wave research, this is more acceptable than errors with short correlation lengths.

Table 1Long-term trends in temperature, ozone, and water vapor in the UTLS region and the derived target and threshold values for GLORIA retrievals.

The standard deviations of the results depend strongly on the retrieved species. For typical correlation lengths of the GLORIA blackbody temperature deviations (10 to 100 pixels) the accepted threshold of 2 % error for the ozone retrieval is reached for standard deviations of 0.2–2 K. Therefore, a required threshold of 200 mK and a target of 100 mK for the temperature standard deviation of the blackbody are defined through the ozone retrieval. These values can be relaxed for temperature deviations with longer correlation lengths, as can be seen in the plot in Fig. 5c. For the temperature retrieval the threshold of 0.16 % uncertainty is reached for all correlation lengths above two pixels at around 400 mK. The target uncertainty is reached already at 200 mK. For water vapor retrievals the threshold and target values are located at a standard deviation of 500 and 250 mK for correlation lengths of one pixel but can be relaxed for more correlated nonuniformities.

Thus, for the GLORIA instrument and the applied retrieval setup, the ozone retrieval sets the threshold requirement of the standard deviation of the blackbody uncertainties to 200 mK and the desired target to 100 mK.

4 Blackbody characterization

The absolute radiance temperature of the GLORIA onboard reference blackbodies is regularly calibrated at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), the national metrology institute of Germany. A rigid and thorough calibration procedure has been established to characterize and calibrate the blackbodies traceable to the national standards of temperature and the international temperature scale ITS-90. The surface radiation temperature is directly measured and compared to blackbody radiation from high-quality cavity radiators linked to the primary standards of temperature radiation . Additionally, the blackbodies are spectrally characterized.

For this purpose, the blackbodies are mounted in the source chamber of the reduced background calibration facility (RBCF). The RBCF serves as facility for the measurement of spectral radiance and radiation temperature of radiation sources and the signal temperature characteristic of radiation thermometers under reduced infrared background radiation in a temperature range from 170 to 430 C traceable to the ITS-90. Its major vacuum components are a source chamber, accommodating the blackbody reference radiators; an optomechanical unit, allowing folding mirrors and an optical chopper to be inserted into the LOS; a beam line; and a detector chamber, which houses the Vacuum Infrared Standard Radiation Thermometer (VIRST). Additionally, an off-axis ellipsoidal mirror in the detector chamber allows the imaging of the radiation from the source chamber into a vacuum FTS for spectrally resolved measurements.

The blackbody surface radiation temperature is measured with the VIRST. VIRST is a stand-alone transfer radiation thermometer which features a vacuum-insulated and thermally stabilized housing, a selected thermopile detector, dedicated readout electronics, and an aspheric germanium lens. A band-pass filter in front of the detector limits the sensitive spectral range from 8 to 14 µm. VIRST achieves a temperature resolution or noise-equivalent temperature difference of better than 10 mK at 0 C. Using VIRST as transfer radiation thermometer, the GLORIA blackbodies are calibrated against the vacuum low-temperature blackbody (VLTBB), operable in a temperature range from 173 to +177 C. The calibration range is from 40 to +40 C. The typical uncertainty for the GLORIA blackbody surface radiation temperature at 40 C at a wavelength of 10 µm is 100 mK (k=2) and is decreasing for higher temperatures.

The measurement spot of VIRST has a diameter of about 10 mm. It is placed directly over the positions of the 10 temperature sensors of the blackbodies, allowing a direct comparison of the radiation surface temperature with the temperature measured at the PT100 sensors. Measurements are taken at temperatures ranging from 40 to +40 C in 10 K steps. Furthermore, surface scans are performed at temperatures of 30, 0, and 20 C. For these measurements, the complete surface of the blackbody is scanned in steps of 4.5 mm.

The spectral characterization is done by measuring the spectral radiance at three locations with the vacuum FTS of the RBCF with respect to the reference blackbody VLTBB in the spectral range from 6.3 to 20 µm at temperatures of 30, 0, and 20 C.

## 4.1 Effective emissivity of the blackbodies

On the basis of the determined spectral radiances, a lower threshold value for the effective emissivity of the blackbodies can be calculated. Since no significant spectral features are found, the blackbodies can be considered to be gray bodies. Assuming an effective emissivity ϵeff, the measured radiance of the blackbodies Lmeas is given as

$\begin{array}{}\text{(17)}& {L}_{\mathrm{meas}}={\mathit{ϵ}}_{\mathrm{eff}}B\left({T}_{\mathrm{BB}}\right)+\left(\mathrm{1}-{\mathit{ϵ}}_{\mathrm{eff}}\right)B\left({T}_{\mathrm{amb}}\right),\end{array}$

with B(TBB) and B(Tamb) being the Planck function of the blackbody and ambient temperature, respectively.

The radiance of an ideal blackbody B(TBB) can thus be calculated as

$\begin{array}{}\text{(18)}& B\left({T}_{\mathrm{BB}}\right)=\frac{{L}_{\mathrm{meas}}\left(T\right)-\left(\mathrm{1}-{\mathit{ϵ}}_{\mathrm{eff}}\right)B\left({T}_{\mathrm{amb}}\right)}{{\mathit{ϵ}}_{\mathrm{eff}}}.\end{array}$

This spectral radiance can be transformed in a radiance temperature by inverting Planck's law at every wavelength and yields a spectral distribution of radiance temperatures. This was done for the three effective emissivities 1.000, 0.997, and 0.995 and the results are shown in Fig. 6. The calculated values are given by the individually colored dots in the figure. For each assumed effective emissivity, a linear fit was performed in order to identify possible trends. The calculated radiance temperatures for the lower emissivity of 0.995 show a significant slope towards shorter wavelengths. This slope can only be real if either the wall coating has a significant slope or the temperature nonuniformity within the measured area is of a similar magnitude as the slope, i.e., 200 mK. The coating Nextel 811-21 can be safely assumed to have a constant value of 0.97 in the spectral range from 500 to 1500 cm−1 with only a slight spectral variability within a given uncertainty of about 0.01 but no significant overall spectral trend or slope .

Figure 6Spectral distribution of the radiance temperatures of the GLORIA reference blackbody BB1 for varying effective emissivities.

Figure 7Differences between surface radiance temperatures and temperatures measured with the PT100 sensors (contact temperature) for BB1 at different temperatures. The approximate positions of the sensors under the optical surface are shown on the right.

Figure 8Measured surface radiance temperatures at 30.15 C (243 K) for BB1 (a) and estimated resulting temperature error for each of the 48 × 128 detector pixels (b).

Figure 9Same as Fig. 9 but for BB2 at 19.85 C (293 K).

In order to exclude a temperature nonuniformity on the order of 200 mK, lateral scans were performed with VIRST over the FOV of the spectrometer on a 6 × 6 grid with 4 mm step size. These measurements show a uniformity of the radiance temperature of better than 18 mK (peak to peak). Therefore, we conclude that the assumed effective emissivity of 0.995 is too low. The slope of the radiance temperatures for the assumed effective emissivity of 0.997 is smaller but still significant. However, considering the uncertainties of the measurement and the VLTBB reference blackbody, which are around 100 mK, we assume 0.997 as a lower limit for the effective emissivity of the GLORIA reference blackbodies. A non-perfect emissivity leads to deviations between the blackbody surface radiation temperature measured by VIRST and the temperature measured by the PT100 sensors if the ambient temperature differs from that of the blackbodies. The effects of a non-perfect emissivity are therefore included in the temperature characterization measurements and handled as temperature uncertainties.

Figure 10Retrieval results derived from GLORIA measurements taken on 26 February 2016. Panel (a) shows temperature, panel (b) shows water vapor, and panel (c) shows ozone. Thick solid lines shows ECMWF potential vorticity, dotted lines shows potential temperature, and big dots show the location of the thermal tropopause.

## 4.2 Temperature characterization results

The measurement results for the different temperatures are shown in Fig. 7 for one of the blackbodies (BB1). The temperature measured by the PT100 sensors generally agrees with the temperature measured by VIRST within ±100 mK. The measured radiation temperatures are generally higher than the measured contact temperatures when operating the blackbody below the ambient temperature and vice versa when operating it above ambient temperature. This can be explained by the finite thermal conductivity of the aluminum and the Nextel coating, as well as a non-perfect emissivity. Furthermore there is a spread of about 30 mK between the 10 temperature sensors.

Two surface scans are shown in Figs. 8a and 9a for BB1 at 30 C and BB2 at +20 C, respectively. The temperature uniformity is within the required threshold of 100 mK, but BB1 shows a systematic deviation in the lower right area of the surface. BB2 at +20 C is very uniform and dominated by noise. These two surface scans are used to estimate a realistic blackbody uncertainty including its distribution over the optical surface.

The area covered by the detector array is approximately from 15 to +15 mm horizontally and from 40 to +40 mm vertically. The detector lens of GLORIA is focused at infinity in order to provide a sharp picture of the horizon. Since the blackbodies are placed closely to the spectrometer, the optical surface is not sharply imaged onto the detector. One detector pixel “sees” a spot of about 30 mm diameter on the blackbody surface. In order to quantify the blackbody temperature uncertainty relevant for each pixel, the values shown in Figs. 8 and 9 on the left have been integrated over 30 mm spots around the center position of each detector pixel image. The resulting temperature uncertainty for each pixel is shown in the right panel of the figures. This uncertainty has been used to calculate Tbb and ${T}_{\mathrm{bb}}^{t}$ for each pixel and with this the radiance uncertainty for each pixel using Eq. (13).

Figure 11Radiances and perturbations for one image acquired at 13:24:09 UTC. Panel (a) shows the measured radiances in a logarithmic color scale. Panel (b) shows the absolute differences introduced by the blackbody inhomogeneity. Panel (c) shows the relative differences in percentages. The values for the lowermost pixel rows were already discarded during a previous processing step due to the presence of clouds.

Figure 12Absolute (blue) and relative (orange) differences between original and perturbed retrieval results for temperature (a), water vapor (b), and ozone (c). Solid lines show the mean differences over the whole flight, the dotted orange line shows the relative median, and the shaded areas show the standard deviation for the 274 evaluated profiles over the flight.

## 4.3 Impact on retrieval

The impact of the uncertainties as derived from the PTB measurements above has been quantified for a measurement flight of one of our recent campaigns. Here, we compare the retrieval results, i.e., derived trace gases, against retrieval results gained from radiances perturbed by calibration uncertainties. Rather arbitrarily, flight 14 from the POLSTRACC campaign of winter 2015/16 was chosen, as this flight covers both situations with rather high and rather low stratospheric temperatures and thus measured radiances. This flight took place on 26 February 2016. The retrieval setup used is described by . We focus here solely on the climate-relevant variables of temperature, water vapor, and ozone.

The derived fields are shown in Fig. 10. The results show rather typical stratospheric air masses for the time of the year.

The measured radiances are modified by applying Eq. (13), using the error fields of Sect. 4.2. Several variations of this error field as changing the sign or orientation of the field have been tested as well. The largest effect on the retrieval results is achieved by taking the measured deviation of one blackbody as it is, but changing the sign for the deviation of the other blackbody. The effect on one single measured radiance profile is depicted in Fig. 11. The perturbations exhibit a spectral and spatial variation, as the introduced deviation depends on the measured radiance itself. In general, the relative deviations are smaller for strong lines like the CO2 Q-branch at 793 cm−1 or the strong ozone lines around 1050 cm−1 and larger for the atmospheric windows.

Continuing to the derived quantities, Fig. 12 shows the absolute and relative differences between the original and the perturbed retrieval results. For temperature, a rather constant bias is introduced, which is on the order of the threshold value of Table 1. For the trace gases, the relative difference is on the order of the target thresholds, except for ozone at lower altitudes, where the volume mixing ratios are very low. Looking at the median, which is less affected by outliers, the relative difference stays on average below the target threshold of 1 %. The results demonstrate that for the given inhomogeneity, the effect on the retrieval results stays on average below the thresholds and thus allows for long-term studies of climate-relevant variables.

5 Conclusions

This study has investigated the propagation of temperature deviations of the calibration blackbody through the GLORIA retrieval algorithm. A Monte Carlo approach has been used to derive uncertainty distributions of the retrieval results according to differently shaped deviations of the blackbody temperature. The shape and strength of the derived uncertainty distributions depend on the correlation length and standard deviation of the blackbody temperature inhomogeneity. In order to be able to resolve typical trends in atmospheric species as temperature, ozone, and water vapor, the retrieval errors should remain below 20 % of the trend. To observe decadal trends, the resulting maximum tolerable temperature deviation of the blackbody temperature from the mean value for a typical correlation length of 10 vertical detector pixels is at 200 mK with a target of 100 mK. The target value is mostly reached for the blackbodies used for the calibration of GLORIA.

With the current data processing and retrieval setup, the temperature and emissivity uncertainties of the GLORIA blackbodies are among the leading sources of uncertainties, together with the uncertainty of the detector nonlinearity determination and the instrument offset determination. Spectroscopic uncertainties and interfering species can have an impact of similar magnitude on the retrieval results. The latter sources of uncertainty can be reduced by further instrument characterization and an optimized retrieval setup, such that the uncertainties of the calibration blackbodies may become the leading error source.

Data availability
Data availability.

The retrieval data from Fig. 10 are available from the HALO database .

Competing interests
Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements.

We thank Friedhelm Olschewski from BUW for the design of the GLORIA blackbodies, the successful improvement with the monolithic backplane, and his contribution to the first calibration campaigns. The valuable support of Marco Schulz (PTB) during the radiometric characterization campaign of the GLORIA reference blackbodies at PTB is gratefully acknowledged.

We gratefully thank the GLORIA team of JÜLICH and KIT, the POLSTRACC coordination team, and DLR-FX for operating the GLORIA instrument and successfully conducting the POLSTRACC field campaign. The POLSTRACC campaign was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG Priority Program SPP 1294).

This work was funded by the European Metrology Research Program (EMRP), Project ENV53, “Metrology for Earth Observation and Climate 2”. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. This work was partly supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) under the project ROMIC/GW-LCYCLE, subproject 2 (01LG1206B), and subproject 3 (01LG1206C), as well as by the European Space Agency (ESA) under contract 4000115111/15/NL/FF/ah (GWEX).

We acknowledge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

The article processing charges for this open-access
publication were covered by a Research
Centre of the Helmholtz Association.

Edited by: Helen Worden
Reviewed by: Joe Taylor and Fabien Dupont

References

Adibekyan, A., Kononogova, E., Monte, C., and Hollandt, J.: High-Accuracy Emissivity Data on the Coatings Nextel 811-21, Herberts 1534, Aeroglaze Z306 and Acktar Fractal Black, Int. J. Thermophys., 38, 89, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-017-2212-z, 2017. a

Bernath, P. F., McElroy, C. T., Abrams, M. C., Boone, C. D., Butler, M., Camy-Peyret, C., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Colin, R., DeCola, P., DeMazière, M., Drummond, J. R., Dufour, D., Evans, W. F. J., Fast, H., Fussen, D., Gilbert, K., Jennings, D. E., Llewellyn, E. J., Lowe, R. P., Mahieu, E., McConnell, J. C., McHugh, M., McLeod, S. D., Michaud, R., Midwinter, C., Nassar, R., Nichitiu, F., Nowlan, C., Rinsland, C. P., Rochon, Y. J., Rowlands, N., Semeniuk, K., Simon, P., Skelton, R., Sloan, J. J., Soucy, M.-A., Strong, K., Tremblay, P., Turnbull, D., Walker, K. A., Walkty, I., Wardle, D. A., Wehrle, V., Zander, R., and Zou, J.: Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE): Mission overview, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15S01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022386, 2005. a

Fischer, H., Birk, M., Blom, C., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., von Clarmann, T., Delbouille, L., Dudhia, A., Ehhalt, D., Endemann, M., Flaud, J. M., Gessner, R., Kleinert, A., Koopman, R., Langen, J., López-Puertas, M., Mosner, P., Nett, H., Oelhaf, H., Perron, G., Remedios, J., Ridolfi, M., Stiller, G., and Zander, R.: MIPAS: an instrument for atmospheric and climate research, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2151–2188, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008, 2008. a

Friedl-Vallon, F., Gulde, T., Hase, F., Kleinert, A., Kulessa, T., Maucher, G., Neubert, T., Olschewski, F., Piesch, C., Preusse, P., Rongen, H., Sartorius, C., Schneider, H., Schönfeld, A., Tan, V., Bayer, N., Blank, J., Dapp, R., Ebersoldt, A., Fischer, H., Graf, F., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Kaufmann, M., Kretschmer, E., Latzko, T., Nordmeyer, H., Oelhaf, H., Orphal, J., Riese, M., Schardt, G., Schillings, J., Sha, M. K., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., and Ungermann, J.: Instrument concept of the imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3565–3577, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3565-2014, 2014. a

Kaufmann, M., Blank, J., Guggenmoser, T., Ungermann, J., Engel, A., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Gerber, D., Grooß, J. U., Guenther, G., Höpfner, M., Kleinert, A., Kretschmer, E., Latzko, Th., Maucher, G., Neubert, T., Nordmeyer, H., Oelhaf, H., Olschewski, F., Orphal, J., Preusse, P., Schlager, H., Schneider, H., Schuettemeyer, D., Stroh, F., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Vogel, B., M. Volk, C., Woiwode, W., and Riese, M.: Retrieval of three-dimensional small-scale structures in upper-tropospheric/lower-stratospheric composition as measured by GLORIA, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 81–95, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-81-2015, 2015. a

Kleinert, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Neubert, T., Ribalda, R., Sha, M. K., Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Ebersoldt, A., Kretschmer, E., Latzko, T., Oelhaf, H., Olschewski, F., and Preusse, P.: Level 0 to 1 processing of the imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA: generation of radiometrically and spectrally calibrated spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4167–4184, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4167-2014, 2014. a

Krisch, I., Preusse, P., Ungermann, J., Dörnbrack, A., Eckermann, S. D., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Kaufmann, M., Oelhaf, H., Rapp, M., Strube, C., and Riese, M.: First tomographic observations of gravity waves by the infrared limb imager GLORIA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14937–14953, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14937-2017, 2017. a

Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S.: The Monte Carlo Method, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 44, 335–341, https://doi.org/10.2307/2280232, 1949. a

Monte, C., Gutschwager, B., Adibekyan, A., Kehrt, M., Ebersoldt, A., Olschewski, F., and Hollandt, J.: Radiometric calibration of the in-flight blackbody calibration system of the GLORIA interferometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 13–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-13-2014, 2014. a

Olschewski, F., Ebersoldt, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Gutschwager, B., Hollandt, J., Kleinert, A., Monte, C., Piesch, C., Preusse, P., Rolf, C., Steffens, P., and Koppmann, R.: The in-flight blackbody calibration system for the GLORIA interferometer on board an airborne research platform, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3067–3082, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3067-2013, 2013. a, b

Press, F.: Earth models obtained by Monte Carlo Inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 5223–5234, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05223, 1968. a

Remedios, J. J., Leigh, R. J., Waterfall, A. M., Moore, D. P., Sembhi, H., Parkes, I., Greenhough, J., Chipperfield, M. P., and Hauglustaine, D.: MIPAS reference atmospheres and comparisons to V4.61/V4.62 MIPAS level 2 geophysical data sets, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 9973–10017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-7-9973-2007, 2007. a

Revercomb, H. E., Buijs, H., Howell, H. B., LaPorte, D. D., Smith, W. L., and Sromovsky, L. A.: Radiometric calibration of IR Fourier transform spectrometers: solution to a problem with the High-Resolution Interferometer Sounder, Appl. Optics, 27, 3210–3218, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.003210, 1988. a

Riese, M., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Blank, J., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Fischer, H., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Hoor, P., Kaufmann, M., Orphal, J., Plöger, F., Spang, R., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and Woiwode, W.: Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) scientific objectives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1915–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014, 2014. a

Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, vol. 2 of Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2000. a

Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., Gordley, L. L., Tansock Jr., J. J., and Esplin, R. W.: Overview of the SABER experiment and preliminary calibration results, Proc. SPIE, 3756, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.366382, 1999. a

Schmidt, T., Wickert, J., and Haser, A.: Variability of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere observed with GPS radio occultation bending angles and temperatures, Adv. Space Res., 46, 150–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.021, 2010. a, b

Solomon, S., Rosenlof, K. H., Portmann, R. W., Daniel, J. S., Davis, S. M., Sanford, T. J., and Plattner, G.-K.: Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming, Science, 327, 1219–1223, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182488, 2010.  a, b

Ungermann, J.: Trace gas curtains measured during POLSTRACC on 20 February 2016, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, available at: https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/dataset/4671, last access: 20 June 2018. a

Ungermann, J., Pan, L. L., Kalicinsky, C., Olschewski, F., Knieling, P., Blank, J., Weigel, K., Guggenmoser, T., Stroh, F., Hoffmann, L., and Riese, M.: Filamentary structure in chemical tracer distributions near the subtropical jet following a wave breaking event, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10517–10534, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10517-2013, 2013. a

Ungermann, J., Blank, J., Dick, M., Ebersoldt, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Giez, A., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, M., Kaufmann, S., Kleinert, A., Krämer, M., Latzko, T., Oelhaf, H., Olchewski, F., Preusse, P., Rolf, C., Schillings, J., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Tan, V., Thomas, N., Voigt, C., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., and Riese, M.: Level 2 processing for the imaging Fourier transform spectrometer GLORIA: derivation and validation of temperature and trace gas volume mixing ratios from calibrated dynamics mode spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2473–2489, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2473-2015, 2015. a, b

WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project – Report No. 55, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. a, b