Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.668 IF 3.668
  • IF 5-year value: 3.707 IF 5-year
    3.707
  • CiteScore value: 6.3 CiteScore
    6.3
  • SNIP value: 1.383 SNIP 1.383
  • IPP value: 3.75 IPP 3.75
  • SJR value: 1.525 SJR 1.525
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 77 Scimago H
    index 77
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
AMT | Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823–4846, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 22 Aug 2018

Research article | 22 Aug 2018

Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments

Tongshu Zheng et al.

Related authors

Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Ronak Sutaria, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Robert Caldow, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5161–5181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
MIMiX: a Multipurpose In situ Microreactor system for X-ray microspectroscopy to mimic atmospheric aerosol processing
Jan-David Förster, Christian Gurk, Mark Lamneck, Haijie Tong, Florian Ditas, Sarah S. Steimer, Peter A. Alpert, Markus Ammann, Jörg Raabe, Markus Weigand, Benjamin Watts, Ulrich Pöschl, Meinrat O. Andreae, and Christopher Pöhlker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3717–3729, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3717-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3717-2020, 2020
Short summary
Application of an O-ring pinch device as a constant-pressure inlet (CPI) for airborne sampling
Sergej Molleker, Frank Helleis, Thomas Klimach, Oliver Appel, Hans-Christian Clemen, Antonis Dragoneas, Christian Gurk, Andreas Hünig, Franziska Köllner, Florian Rubach, Christiane Schulz, Johannes Schneider, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3651–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3651-2020, 2020
Short summary
Resolving the size of ice-nucleating particles with a balloon deployable aerosol sampler: the SHARK
Grace C. E. Porter, Sebastien N. F. Sikora, Michael P. Adams, Ulrike Proske, Alexander D. Harrison, Mark D. Tarn, Ian M. Brooks, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2905–2921, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020, 2020
Short summary
Simultaneous measurements of the relative-humidity-dependent aerosol light extinction, scattering, absorption, and single-scattering albedo with a humidified cavity-enhanced albedometer
Jiacheng Zhou, Xuezhe Xu, Weixiong Zhao, Bo Fang, Qianqian Liu, Yuanqing Cai, Weijun Zhang, Dean S. Venables, and Weidong Chen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2623–2634, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2623-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2623-2020, 2020
Short summary
Flow-induced errors in airborne in situ measurements of aerosols and clouds
Antonio Spanu, Maximilian Dollner, Josef Gasteiger, T. Paul Bui, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1963–1987, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1963-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1963-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, E., Novosselov, I., Seto, E., and Yost, M. G.: Laboratory evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS low-cost particulate matter sensor, PLoS One, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137789, 2015. 
Bergin, M. H., Tripathi, S. N., Jai Devi, J., Gupta, T., Mckenzie, M., Rana, K. S., Shafer, M. M., Villalobos, A. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The discoloration of the Taj Mahal due to particulate carbon and dust deposition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1021/es504005q, 2015. 
Bran, S. H. and Srivastava, R.: Investigation of PM2.5 mass concentration over India using a regional climate model, Environ. Pollut., 224, 484–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.030, 2017. 
Breen, M. S., Long, T. C., Schultz, B. D., Williams, R. W., Richmond-Bryant, J., Breen, M., Langstaff, J. E., Devlin, R. B., Schneider, A., Burke, J. M., Batterman, S. A., and Meng, Q. Y.: Air Pollution Exposure Model for Individuals (EMI) in Health Studies: Evaluation for Ambient PM 2.5 in Central North Carolina, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14184–14194, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02765, 2015. 
Chakrabarti, B., Fine, P. M., Delfino, R., and Sioutas, C.: Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3329–3340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.007, 2004. 
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality monitoring networks but their performance under field conditions is not well understood. We characterized how well Plantower PMS3003 sensors measure PM2.5 in a wide range of ambient conditions against different reference sensors. When a more precise reference method is used for calibration and proper RH corrections are made, our work suggests PMS3003's can measure PM2.5 within ~ 10 % of ambient values.
Low-cost particulate matter sensors are promising tools for supplementing existing air quality...
Citation