Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Volume 11, issue 9 | Copyright

Special issue: Quadrennial Ozone Symposium 2016 – Status and trends...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5125-5152, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 10 Sep 2018

Research article | 10 Sep 2018

Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements

Anne Boynard1,2, Daniel Hurtmans3, Katerina Garane4, Florence Goutail1, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro1, Maria Elissavet Koukouli4, Catherine Wespes3, Corinne Vigouroux5, Arno Keppens5, Jean-Pierre Pommereau1, Andrea Pazmino1, Dimitris Balis4, Diego Loyola6, Pieter Valks6, Ralf Sussmann7, Dan Smale8, Pierre-François Coheur3, and Cathy Clerbaux1,3 Anne Boynard et al.
  • 1LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UVSQ, CNRS, Paris, 75252, France
  • 2SPASCIA, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, 31520, France
  • 3Atmospheric Spectroscopy, Service de Chimie Quantique et Photophysique, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
  • 4Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
  • 5Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, 1180, Belgium
  • 6Institut für Methodik der Fernerkundung (IMF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
  • 7Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
  • 8National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand

Abstract. This paper assesses the quality of IASI (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer)/Metop-A (IASI-A) and IASI/Metop-B (IASI-B) ozone (O3) products (total and partial O3 columns) retrieved with the Fast Optimal Retrievals on Layers for IASI Ozone (FORLI-O3; v20151001) software for 9 years (2008–July 2017) through an extensive intercomparison and validation exercise using independent observations (satellite, ground-based and ozonesonde). Compared with the previous version of FORLI-O3 (v20140922), several improvements have been introduced in FORLI-O3 v20151001, including absorbance look-up tables recalculated to cover a larger spectral range, with additional numerical corrections. This leads to a change of  ∼ 4% in the total ozone column (TOC) product, which is mainly associated with a decrease in the retrieved O3 concentration in the middle stratosphere (above 30hPa/25km). IASI-A and IASI-B TOCs are consistent, with a global mean difference of less than 0.3% for both daytime and nighttime measurements; IASI-A is slightly higher than IASI-B. A global difference of less than 2.4% is found for the tropospheric (TROPO) O3 column product (IASI-A is lower than IASI-B), which is partly due to a temporary issue related to the IASI-A viewing angle in 2015. Our validation shows that IASI-A and IASI-B TOCs are consistent with GOME-2 (Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2), Dobson, Brewer, SAOZ (Système d'Analyse par Observation Zénithale) and FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) TOCs, with global mean differences in the range of 0.1%–2% depending on the instruments compared. The worst agreement with UV–vis retrieved TOC (satellite and ground) is found at the southern high latitudes. The IASI-A and ground-based TOC comparison for the period from 2008 to July 2017 shows the long-term stability of IASI-A, with insignificant or small negative drifts of 1%–3%decade−1. The comparison results of IASI-A and IASI-B against smoothed FTIR and ozonesonde partial O3 columns vary with altitude and latitude, with the maximum standard deviation being seen for the 300–150hPa column (20%–40%) due to strong ozone variability and large total retrievals errors. Compared with ozonesonde data, the IASI-A and IASI-B O3 TROPO column (defined as the column between the surface and 300hPa) is positively biased in the high latitudes (4%–5%) and negatively biased in the midlatitudes and tropics (11%–13% and 16%–19%, respectively). The IASI-A-to-ozonesonde TROPO comparison for the period from 2008 to 2016 shows a significant negative drift in the Northern Hemisphere of −8.6±3.4%decade−1, which is also found in the IASI-A-to-FTIR TROPO comparison. When considering the period from 2011 to 2016, the drift value for the TROPO column decreases and becomes statistically insignificant. The observed negative drifts of the IASI-A TROPO O3 product (8%–16%decade−1) over the 2008–2017 period might be taken into consideration when deriving trends from this product and this time period.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we perform a comprehensive validation of the IASI/Metop ozone data using independent observations (satellite, ground-based and ozonesonde). The quality of the IASI total and tropospheric ozone columns in terms of bias and long-term stability is generally good. Compared with ozonesonde data, IASI overestimates (underestimates) the ozone abundance in the stratosphere (troposphere). A negative drift in tropospheric ozone is observed, which is not well understood at this point.
In this paper, we perform a comprehensive validation of the IASI/Metop ozone data using...
Citation
Share