Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
AMT | Articles | Volume 11, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5125–5152, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Quadrennial Ozone Symposium 2016 – Status and trends...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5125–5152, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 10 Sep 2018

Research article | 10 Sep 2018

Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements

Anne Boynard et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,443 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
909 509 25 1,443 25 30
  • HTML: 909
  • PDF: 509
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 1,443
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,413 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,407 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
Saved (discussion paper)  
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we perform a comprehensive validation of the IASI/Metop ozone data using independent observations (satellite, ground-based and ozonesonde). The quality of the IASI total and tropospheric ozone columns in terms of bias and long-term stability is generally good. Compared with ozonesonde data, IASI overestimates (underestimates) the ozone abundance in the stratosphere (troposphere). A negative drift in tropospheric ozone is observed, which is not well understood at this point.
In this paper, we perform a comprehensive validation of the IASI/Metop ozone data using...
Citation