Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5461-5470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5461-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5461-5470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5461-2018

Research article 05 Oct 2018

Research article | 05 Oct 2018

# First fully diurnal fog and low cloud satellite detection reveals life cycle in the Namib

Fully diurnal FLC detection
Hendrik Andersen1,2 and Jan Cermak1,2 Hendrik Andersen and Jan Cermak
• 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
• 2Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Karlsruhe, Germany
Abstract

Fog and low clouds (FLCs) are a typical feature along the southwestern African coast, especially in the central Namib, where fog constitutes a valuable resource of water for many ecosystems. In this study, a novel algorithm is presented to detect FLCs over land from geostationary satellite data using only infrared observations. The algorithm is the first of its kind as it is stationary in time and thus able to reveal a detailed view of the diurnal and spatial patterns of FLCs in the Namib region. A validation against net radiation measurements from a station network in the central Namib reveals a high overall accuracy with a probability of detection of 94 %, a false-alarm rate of 12 % and an overall correctness of classification of 97 %. The average timing and persistence of FLCs seem to depend on the distance to the coast, suggesting that the region is dominated by advection-driven FLCs. While the algorithm is applied to study Namib-region fog and low clouds, it is designed to be transferable to other regions and can be used to retrieve long-term data sets.

1 Introduction

Fog is commonly perceived as a hazardous weather situation that can impact traffic systems as well as the economy . In arid environments like the Namib desert, fog can act as a critical source of water that enables life for diverse species and helps to sustain ecosystems (Azúa-Bustos et al.2011; Ebner et al.2011; Eckardt et al.2013; McHugh et al.2015; Roth-Nebelsick et al.2012; Seely1979; Shanyengana2002). As such, knowledge on the exact occurrence and spatiotemporal patterns of fog holds potential, ranging from socioeconomic benefits to a better understanding of fog processes and fog-driven ecosystems.

As previous studies (Cermak and Knutti2009; Egli et al.2016; Lee et al.2011; Nilo et al.2018) have shown, geostationary satellites have the potential to draw a spatiotemporally coherent picture of the occurrence of fog and low clouds (FLCs). However, information on FLCs from satellites is typically inferred using separate daytime (Bendix et al.2006; Cermak and Bendix2008, 2011; Nilo et al.2018) and night-time (Cermak and Bendix2007; Ellrod1995) algorithms, disrupting our view of fog development at a critical time of its life cycle, as typically, shortwave radiative heating starts the dissipation of fog shortly after sunrise . This break in retrieval techniques has thus limited the applicability of satellite-based FLC observations for the analysis of entire fog life cycles. have developed an approach to continuously monitor fog from a geostationary satellite platform; however, their algorithm essentially consisted of three different modes, day, dusk/dawn and night, and cannot be described as stationary in time. While, for visualization purposes, 24 h false-color image products may be used in case studies, these images are not well suited for quantitative analyses. The overarching goal of this study is thus to develop and validate a single, diurnally stable satellite retrieval of FLCs over land to enable the exploration of currently untapped potentials of satellite-based analyses of FLCs.

Past satellite retrieval algorithms of FLCs have typically consisted of a sequential application of a number of spectral tests on the basis of individual pixels in the initial classification and a subsequent merging of FLC pixels to entities (Cermak and Bendix2008; Egli et al.2016). Using only spectral information, FLCs can be detected using a combination of brightness temperatures in the middle infrared (MIR) and thermal infrared (TIR) . As during daytime, the MIR has a solar component, separate daytime and night-time retrievals are needed. A stable and fully diurnal retrieval of FLCs would thus have to solely rely on observations in the TIR. However, as state, a purely TIR-based detection of FLCs is not possible, as the brightness temperatures of FLCs and land surfaces are too similar.

In the realm of image analysis and machine vision, the spatial context of a pixel is often exploited for its classification . In recent times, the utilization of contextual information has become more frequent in environmental remote-sensing techniques (Bian et al.2016; Kim et al.2018; Zhu and Woodcock2012). For FLCs, distinct spatial patterns that vary over time are to be expected due to the inversion-limited homogeneous cloud top and the coherent movement of FLC patches over the Earth surface. The guiding hypothesis of this study is as follows.

By a combination of spectral tests and contextual information, FLCs can be robustly detected using only satellite observations in the thermal infrared and enable new insights into the diurnal patterns of FLCs and their spatial variability.

In this study, FLCs are detected along the southwestern African coast with a specific focus on the central Namib desert, where fog is an important part of local ecosystems . Knowledge on the spatiotemporal occurrence of Namib-region fog is incomplete (Cermak2012), and while it is commonly tied to the quasi-persistent stratiform clouds in the southeastern Atlantic , the processes that lead to the formation of fog are still controversially discussed, as recently, found indications of frequent water from freshwater sources in fog and related this to radiatively driven fog formation.

The data used and the novel FLC detection technique are described in Sect. 2, and a statistical evaluation of the algorithm is given in Sect. 3. Spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds in the Namib are presented in Sect. 4, and conclusions and an outlook are given in Sect. 5.

2 Data and approach

## 2.1 Geostationary satellite observations

The main data basis for this study are observations from the most recent Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on board the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG, in this case Meteosat 11) satellite platform. While the SEVIRI instrument's measurements cover a spectral range from 0.6 to 13.4 µm with 11 channels (plus a high-resolution visible channel), here, only the calibrated brightness temperatures from four channels in the TIR are used (8.7, 10.8, 12.0 and 13.4 µm). The SEVIRI instrument features a repeat rate of 15 min (96 hemispheric scans per day), at a spatial resolution of 3 km at nadir . The data used in this study cover the period from 2015 to 2017 in the region from 13.5 to 35 S and from 10 to 20 E, considering only regions over land.

## 2.2 Algorithm design

The FLC-detection algorithm has two parts: (1) an initial classification and (2) a contextual plausibility control of detected FLC pixels. The initial classification of a given scene is designed as a decision tree, with sequential application of (a) simple spectral thresholds as shown in Table 1 and, (b) if none of the spectral tests are true, the application of a structural image test. Sequential spectral testing stops once a class is determined, and the following tests are not carried out. The additional contextual plausibility control is only tested for FLC pixels. It should be noted that the algorithm presented here does not differentiate between ground fog and low-level clouds.

Table 1The thresholds used for different channels and channel combinations in this study with the outcome of the initial classification. Threshold values were determined by systematic visual analysis of SEVIRI scenes and values found in literature (Cermak2012).

The discrimination of low-level liquid-water and higher-level ice clouds with satellite observations is comparatively easy, especially in the Namib region (Olivier1995). In this study, high clouds are identified based on the brightness temperature at 10.8 µm as a proxy for cloud-top temperature, and the difference in 8.7 and 12.0 or 13.4 µm brightness temperatures is an indication of ice clouds . To avoid subpixel effects of higher-level cloud edges that may lead to false FLC retrievals, the surrounding pixels of detected high clouds are also classified as difficult.

After the identification of high clouds, low clouds and land surfaces need to be discriminated. As already indicated in the introduction, the separation of FLCs and land surfaces is much more difficult in the thermal infrared than in other wavelength regions . While land surfaces can be distinguished from FLCs with the described spectral tests in some regions, frequently this is not the case (cf. Fig. 1). In order to robustly separate land surfaces from FLCs, additional contextual information is needed. In this case, the brightness temperature difference between 12.0 and 8.7 µm of each scene is compared to two composites. The composites are constructed on the basis of long-term 12.0–8.7 µm observations and are intended to represent land-surface structures in cloud-free conditions. The underlying assumption for the construction of the composites is that clouds typically have lower values in the channel difference of 12.0–8.7 µm than land surfaces (Cermak2012). The two composites are built as follows:

1. A monthly composite is created by using the monthly maximum 12.0–8.7 µm value at each SEVIRI time slot. Of these 96 monthly time-slot maxima, the median value is used at each pixel. Monthly composites comprise seasonal variations in land surface properties but may in some cases be prone to cloud contamination in cloudy months at cloudy locations.

2. Thus, an annual composite is constructed by taking the median of all monthly composites for each pixel. This way, potential local, seasonally occurring cloud contaminations within the monthly composites can be eliminated.

For the separation of land surfaces and FLCs, each scene (Fig. 1a) is compared to these composites (e.g., Fig. 1b) by computing a structural similarity index (SSIM , Python implementation of scikit-image ) between the scene and the composites. The SSIM consists of comparisons of luminance (averages), contrast (standard deviations of zero-centered anomalies) and structure (correlation of normalized values) of two images. In the context of this work, the SSIM compares a moving window of 5×5-pixel image sections of a given scene with the corresponding image sections of each of the composites (Fig. 1c). The moving window is optimized to be as small as possible and still be useful for comparing local structures. A high SSIM (in this case >0.4) gives an indication that the pixel is clear as illustrated in Fig. 1c. The size of the moving window, as well as the threshold for the SSIM were optimized empirically. The comparison of Fig. 1d and e shows the effect of introducing the SSIM test in the algorithm. It should be noted that the applicability of the SSIM is only given if (a) the composite is indeed cloud-free and (b) the composite exhibits sufficient spatial heterogeneity in the 5×5 pixel window. Consequently, this technique is only applicable over land and not ocean surfaces (no clear, stable spatial structures in the TIR). To ensure this, two quality flags are empirically derived from the composites: pixels are flagged when (a) the coefficient of variation of the 96 monthly time-slot maxima exceeds 0.3, indicating cloud contamination, and (b) when the standard deviation within a 5×5 pixel window of the monthly composite is lower than 0.1, indicating insufficient spatial heterogeneity in the specific window of the composite.

Figure 1(a) An exemplary scene (13 January 2016, 05:00 UTC) in the channel combination 12.0–8.7 µm is compared to (b) the monthly composite of January 2016 resulting in (c) the structural similarity of the scene with the composite. (d) Illustration of the classification results relying on spectral tests only and (e) including the SSIM test. Quality flags are not applied in this example.

A situation in which this approach may fail is at higher-level cloud edges. These pixels can be have a similar spectral signature to FLCs and can pass the SSIM test, as the partly overlying high cloud reduces the similarity with the composites. To avoid such misclassifications, a contextual plausibility control of the detected FLC pixels is conducted after the initial classification. The plausibility of an accurate FLC detection is estimated by analyzing neighboring pixels. Pixel classifications are changed to “difficult”, if at least five of their eight directly neighboring pixels are classified as either high cloud or surface due to the SSIM test. As changing a pixel classification to the class difficult affects the result of the plausibility control in the direct pixel neighborhood, the plausibility control is iteratively repeated for all FLC pixels until no further changes are possible. After the first iteration, the control mechanism is changed slightly, so that pixels are classified as difficult if more than six (instead of five) directly neighboring pixels are classified as either high cloud, surface due to the SSIM test or difficult to account for potential control-inherent classification changes.

The introduction of the SSIM test leads to relative independence of the algorithm from strict thresholds for the separation of FLCs and land surfaces. As the monthly and annual composites used for the SSIM test are directly derived from the satellite observations, the algorithm self-adjusts to the specific characteristics of the data, likely leading to a weaker sensitivity to sensor degradation or platform changes. The technique might thus hold potential for the observation of climatic changes in FLC occurrence. The conceptual design of the algorithm is thought to be applicable to other regions, as long as a valid composite can be constructed from satellite infrared observations.

## 2.3 Validation approach

For the validation of the satellite-derived FLC product, three years (2015–2017) of net radiation measurements from FogNet stations in the central Namib are used. The FogNet station network comprises 11 automated meteorological stations that are aligned in two transects (N–S from 22.97 to 23.92 S and W–E from 14.46 to 15.31 E) as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The stations were installed as part of the Southern African Science Service Centre for Climate Change and Adaptive Land Management (SASSCAL) initiative and offer valuable meteorological measurements in this remote region . Of the 11 stations, 9 conduct net radiation measurements every minute using the Kipp & Zonen NR-Lite net radiometer. Station measurements are averaged between the start of two SEVIRI time slots to fit its 15 min temporal resolution. The temporal averaging is also intended to mediate the effects of the different spatial resolutions, similarly to the approach in , as borders of advective FLCs may be better captured.

Figure 2(a) Locations of the FogNet stations; definitions of abbreviations (station names) are listed in the appendix. Red markers indicate the stations used for validation in this study. (b) Exemplary time series of net radiation measurements at Vogelfederberg (VF). Highlighted in red are situations for which the satellite algorithm has detected FLCs.

The evaluation of the satellite-derived FLC product was performed using a set of confusion matrix tests, as is typically done (Cermak2012; Egli et al.2016). By comparing the binary (FLC yes or no) information from the satellite product with the ground truth in a 2-by-2 contingency table, each satellite observation can be identified as either a hit, false alarm, miss or correct negative. The sum of the four equals the sample size used for the validation. The following statistical measures are computed to evaluate the FLC product: probability of detection (POD – fraction of ground truth FLCs that are correctly detected), percent correct (PC – fraction of overall correct classifications), false-alarm rate (FAR – fraction of detected FLCs that are false alarms), bias score (BS – measure of bias in the classification, overestimation: BS > 1, underestimation: BS < 1), critical success index (CSI – overall measure of the correctness), and the Heidke skill score (HSS – fractional improvement of the classification over a random classification). The equations for the statistical evaluation measures are given in the appendix.

3 Validation of the algorithm

Figure 3a summarizes validation results qualitatively and quantitatively. The red histogram line shows the bimodal distribution of the aggregated night-time net radiation measurements at the nine FogNet stations for the period of 2015–2017 (excluding high cloud and difficult observations), whereas the blue line represents the same station measurements, filtered for satellite-detected FLC situations. High clouds and difficult situations (grey line) are excluded from the validation as they cannot be clearly separated from clear or FLC situations with surface net radiation measurements. It is apparent that most of the ground-truth FLC situations are captured by the satellite product (POD of 0.94), with only a few false alarms (FAR of 0.12). The product features a high accuracy (PC of 0.97) with only a marginal positive bias (BS of 1.01). This leads to an overall high quality of the classification as expressed by a CSI of 0.83 and a HSS of 0.89. All in all, the validation is based on 325 836 co-located observations. As illustrated in Fig. 3b, there is relatively little variation in the validation results between the different FogNet stations. The most inland station Garnet Koppie (GK) accounts for all outliers in Fig. 3b and has the highest false-alarm rate. Here, FLC occurrence frequency is thus overestimated, leading to lower overall skill. This can be attributed to the rarity of the FLC occurrence in this region (cf. Fig. 4a), where a single, random misclassification has a higher relative impact. The overall accuracy of the product is considerably higher than current state-of-the-art algorithms for Europe (Cermak and Knutti2009; Egli et al.2016; Nilo et al.2018), probably in part due to the more complex and diverse terrain and cloud structures that have to be discriminated there, and comparable to the SEVIRI-based FLC product for this region by . However, the algorithm in is tailored to two specific times of the day and includes satellite observations in the visible and near-infrared spectrum. These comparisons with validation results from other studies are of an indicative nature, as differences could also be caused by the reference data used as ground truth or different periods considered.

Figure 3(a) The aggregated validation of the satellite-derived FLC product at all stations of the time period of 2015–2017, (b) the variability of validation measures across the used FogNet stations. The median is represented in boxes by the red horizontal line; the boxes show the interquartile range, the whiskers expand the boxes by up to 1.5 interquartile ranges. The station GK accounts for all outliers.

It should be noted that the comparison of station-level net radiation measurements with a binary satellite product is certainly not perfect. Two potential sources of error may specifically affect the validation results:

• A large difference in spatial resolution of the two observations exists. While station measurements are temporally averaged with the intent of approximating spatial variation within the area covered by a SEVIRI pixel (Andersen et al.2017), the difference in field of view cannot be neglected. The difference in spatial resolution is expected to randomly lead to erroneous comparisons in both ways and thus not markedly affect the validation results. This may explain the overestimation of the FLC occurrence frequency at GK, as the effect of this small random error on the validation measures scales inversely with FLC occurrence.

• Net radiation measurements are binarized in order to create a “ground truth”, even though the two modes of the distribution are not perfectly separated. For measurements close to the threshold value, an accurate discrimination of “FLC” and “not FLC” is not possible. This is likely to artificially impair validation results and is manifested in a higher frequency of false alarms and misses for situations for which net radiation measurements are close to the threshold value.

In addition to the validation described here, considerable effort has gone into the systematic evaluation of classifications of individual scenes as illustrated in Fig. 1. In light of these arguments, the validation results give confidence in the skill of the novel algorithm and the derived FLC product, which is well suited for the purpose of characterizing the spatial and temporal patterns of FLCs in the Namib desert.

4 Spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds in the Namib

Figure 4a shows the average FLC occurrence frequency in the study area over the study period. FLCs most frequently occur in the plane regions along the coastline (cf. Fig. 4c). Three core regions of the FLC occurrence can be identified in the Angolan parts of the Namib at around 16–17 S, in a region stretching from Walvis Bay at 23 S northwards to about 18 S and at Alexander Bay at around 28 S. The patterns closely resemble those found by and qualitatively and quantitatively. As illustrated by Fig. 4b, in some regions a reliable retrieval of FLCs is often not possible. This can be related to frequent occurrences of high clouds in the tropical northern parts of the study area, too little spatial variance in the clear-sky composites, e.g., in the region of the Etendeka flood basalts at 20 S and 14 E , or where the monthly composites were not stationary in time in some northeastern parts of the study area.

Figure 4(a) Average relative frequency of occurrence of FLCs along the southwestern African coast during the period 2015–2017. (b) Number of observations where the retrieval of FLCs is possible (i.e., no high clouds and no composite-related quality flags). (c) Digital elevation model of the study area.

Figure 5 illustrates the average diurnal cycle of FLCs at all FogNet stations as retrieved from the satellite. It is apparent that at stations close to the coast (purple-blue lines), FLCs occur much more frequently than further inland. The general diurnal behavior of FLCs is similar at all stations, with a distinct peak of the FLC occurrence at night between 03:30 UTC with 9 % relative occurrence frequency of FLCs at Garnet Koppie (GK) and 06:15 UTC with 64 % at SW, and typically a fairly fast dissipation shortly after sunrise. However, distinct features of the diurnal cycle of FLCs can be identified at some stations. At the station Saltworks (SW), located directly at the coastline (cf. Fig. 2), FLCs tend to start to occur in the early afternoon, several hours before other stations are overcast. This could potentially be related to local land–sea winds that transport FLCs from the ocean over land during this time. In general, a time lag exists at the average start of the diurnal cycle, as well as in the time of the diurnal maximum occurrence frequency that seems to be dependent on the longitudinal position of the stations, which approximates their distance to the coastline. This time lag is indicative of a region that is generally dominated by FLCs that form at the coast or over the ocean and is then advected inland, as described by , and , contrasting more recent findings by . As FLCs are advected inland, locations close to the coastline are overcast first. At the coast, FLCs not only occur earlier in the day but typically also persists longer than further inland, where FLCs tend to start dissipating before sunrise. The dissipation rate (negative δ FLS occurrence δ time in the morning hours) at inland stations is considerably lower than closer to the coast, which can probably be attributed to stronger solar irradiance later in the day. It should be noted that the figure represents highly aggregated information on the average diurnal cycle of FLCs and does not preclude other formation or dissipation processes.

Figure 5Average diurnal cycle of the FLC occurrence at FogNet stations. Lines are colored by the longitudinal rank of each specific station, with coastal stations in dark colors and stations further inland in brighter colors. Every other line is dashed with the only purpose of helping their visual discrimination.

As a detailed statistical analysis of the full life cycle of FLCs and their seasonal behavior is not within the scope of this paper, this example is intended to illustrate the potential of the novel algorithm for the analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds over land.

5 Conclusions and outlook

The central aim of this study was to develop the first thermal-infrared-only and thereby diurnally stable satellite retrieval of fog and low clouds. The algorithm design uses a combination of spectral tests and contextual information in order to retrieve FLCs. A structural similarity index is computed, comparing each satellite scene with cloud-free composites to discriminate between land surfaces and FLCs. The novel algorithm is thereby relatively independent from exact spectral thresholds and thus has the potential to be easily applied to other regions and to generate climate data sets. An operational deployment is possible with small adjustments in algorithm design and holds potential for the prediction of FLC dissipation. In the future, the value of the derived FLC product may be further enhanced with a retrieval of cloud-base altitudes for the separation of low-level clouds from ground fog.

The algorithm was applied to detect spatial and temporal patterns of Namib-region FLCs and was validated against net radiation measurements at the FogNet station network located in the central Namib region. The algorithm shows good overall detection accuracy, with a few false alarms and a small positive bias, and relatively little station-to-station variation. FLCs most frequently occur close to the southwestern African coastline, with Walvis Bay among the core regions, confirming findings from and . The diurnal cycle of FLCs is described for the locations of the FogNet stations. Marked differences in the timing of the FLC occurrence and temporal persistence are found. The time lag of the FLC occurrence from the coast to inland regions may be attributed to the advection of FLCs from the coast inland, a typical feature of the region . FLCs persist longer in coastal regions than further inland and but then dissipates more rapidly after sunrise.

The study shows the potential of the diurnal FLC algorithm to study fog and low-cloud patterns, processes and life cycles. Future research efforts should focus on coherently mapping diurnal characteristics of FLCs; further understanding fog formation processes, specifically considering knowledge on the factors that drive low-level clouds in the southeastern Atlantic (Adebiyi et al.2018; Andersen and Cermak2015; Fuchs et al.2017, 2018), and potentially detecting changes in FLC occurrence. This may best be achieved by combining the satellite retrievals with numerical modeling and ground-based observations, and will be undertaken within the ongoing research project Namib Fog Life Cycle Analysis (NaFoLiCA).

Code and data availability
Code and data availability.

Code and data are available on request.

Appendix A: Equations of statistical validation measures
$\begin{array}{ll}& \mathrm{POD}=\frac{a}{a+c}\\ & \mathrm{PC}=\frac{a+d}{a+b+c+d}\\ & \mathrm{FAR}=\frac{b}{a+b}\\ & \mathrm{CSI}=\frac{a}{a+b+c}\\ & \mathrm{BS}=\frac{a+b}{a+c}\\ & \mathrm{HSS}=\frac{\mathrm{2}\left(ad-bc\right)}{\left(a+c\right)\left(c+d\right)+\left(a+b\right)\left(b+d\right)}\\ ,\end{array}$

where a is the number of hits, b is the number of false alarms, c is the number of misses and d is the number of correct negatives.

Appendix B: Abbreviations of FogNet stations
 Definition Abbreviation Aussinanis AU Coastal Met CM Conception Water CW Garnet Koppie GK Gobabeb Met GB Kleinberg KB Marble Koppie MK Saltworks SW Sophies Hoogte SH Station 8 S8 Vogelfederberg VF
Author contributions
Author contributions.

HA had the conceptual idea for the algorithm, developed the method and wrote the software, obtained and analyzed the data sets, conducted the original research and wrote the manuscript. JC contributed to method design, manuscript preparation and the interpretation of findings.

Competing interests
Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Special issue statement
Special issue statement.

This article is part of the special issue “New observations and related modeling studies of the aerosol-cloud-climate system in the southeastern Atlantic and southern Africa regions (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.

Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements.

Funding for this study was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the project Namib Fog Life Cycle Analysis (NaFoLiCA), CE 163/7-1. The authors would like to thank the Gobabeb Research and Training Centre for access to the station measurements and gratefully acknowledge the Gobabeb maintenance team, Folke Olesen and Frank Göttsche for their efforts in the field. We thank Roland Vogt (University of Basel) for providing the FogNet data and Mary Seely for her contributions in the development of FogNet. The authors also thank Julia Fuchs, Frank Göttsche, Folke Olesen, Roland Stirnberg and Roland Vogt for helpful discussions, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

The article processing charges for this open-access
publication were covered by a Research
Centre of the Helmholtz Association.

Edited by: Joshua Schwarz
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees

References

Adebiyi, A. A., Zuidema, P., and Sciences, A.: Low cloud cover sensitivity to biomass-burning aerosols and meteorology over the southeast Atlantic, J. Climate, 2, 4329–4346, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0406.1, 2018. a

Andersen, H. and Cermak, J.: How thermodynamic environments control stratocumulus microphysics and interactions with aerosols, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 24004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004, 2015. a

Andersen, H., Cermak, J., Fuchs, J., Knutti, R., and Lohmann, U.: Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and properties with global observations using neural networks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9535–9546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017, 2017. a, b

Azúa-Bustos, A., González-Silva, C., Mancilla, R. A., Salas, L., Gómez-Silva, B., McKay, C. P., and Vicuña, R.: Hypolithic Cyanobacteria Supported Mainly by Fog in the Coastal Range of the Atacama Desert, Microb. Ecol., 61, 568–581, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9784-5, 2011. a

Bauer, K., Neben, S., Schreckenberger, B., Emmermann, R., Hinz, K., Fechner, N., Gohl, K., Schulze, A., Trumbull, R. B., and Weber, K.: Deep structure of the Namibia continental margin as derived from integrated geophysical studies, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25829, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900227, 2000. a

Bendix, J., Thies, B., Nauß, T., and Cermak, J.: A feasibility study of daytime fog and low stratus detection with TERRA/AQUA-MODIS over land, Meteorol. Appl., 13, 111, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482706002180, 2006. a

Bian, J., Li, A., Liu, Q., and Huang, C.: Cloud and snow discrimination for CCD images of HJ-1A/B constellation based on spectral signature and spatio-temporal context, Remote Sensing, 8, 31, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010031, 2016. a

Cermak, J.: Low clouds and fog along the South-Western African coast – Satellite-based retrieval and spatial patterns, Atmos. Res., 116, 15–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.012, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Dynamical Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Based on Meteosat SEVIRI Data: A Feasibility Study, Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1179–1192, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0213-8, 2007. a, b

Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using Meteosat 8 data, Atmos. Res., 87, 279–292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.009, 2008. a, b, c

Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Detecting ground fog from space – a microphysics-based approach, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 3345–3371, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003747505, 2011. a

Cermak, J. and Knutti, R.: Beijing Olympics as an Aerosol Field Experiment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038572, 2009. a, b, c

Ebner, M., Miranda, T., and Roth-Nebelsick, A.: Efficient fog harvesting by Stipagrostis sabulicola (Namib dune bushman grass), J. Arid Environ., 75, 524–531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004, 2011. a

Eckardt, F., Soderberg, K., Coop, L., Muller, A., Vickery, K., Grandin, R., Jack, C., Kapalanga, T., and Henschel, J.: The nature of moisture at Gobabeb, in the central Namib Desert, J. Arid Environ., 93, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.011, 2013. a, b

Egli, S., Thies, B., Drönner, J., Cermak, J., and Bendix, J.: A 10 year fog and low stratus climatology for Europe based on Meteosat Second Generation data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 530–541, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2941, 2016. a, b, c, d

Egli, S., Thies, B., and Bendix, J.: A Hybrid Approach for Fog Retrieval Based on a Combination of Satellite and Ground Truth Data, Remote Sensing, 10, 628, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040628, 2018. a

Ellrod, G. P.: Advances in the Detection and Analysis of Fog at Night Using GOES Multispectral Infrared Imagery, Weather Forecast., 10, 606–619, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0606:AITDAA>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a

Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., Andersen, H., Hollmann, R., and Schwarz, K.: On the Influence of Air Mass Origin on Low-Cloud Properties in the Southeast Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11076–11091, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027184, 2017. a

Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., and Andersen, H.: Building a cloud in the Southeast Atlantic: Understanding low-cloud controls based on satellite observations with machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-593, in review, 2018. a

Glasbey, C. A.: An Analysis of Histogram-Based Thresholding Algorithms, CVGIP-Graph. Model. Im., 55, 532–537, https://doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1993.1040, 1993. a

Guls, I. and Bendix, J.: Fog detection and fog mapping using low cost Meteosat-WEFAX transmission, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 179–187, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.5060030208, 1996. a, b

Haeffelin, M., Bergot, T., Elias, T., Tardif, R., Carrer, D., Chazette, P., Colomb, M., Drobinski, P., Dupont, E., Dupont, J. C., Gomes, L., Musson-Genon, L., Pietras, C., Plana-Fattori, A., Protat, A., Rangognio, J., Raut, J. C., Rémy, S., Richard, D., Sciare, J., and Zhang, X.: PARISFOG: Shedding new light on fog physical processes, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 767–783, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2671.1, 2010. a

Henschel, J. and Seely, M.: Ecophysiology of atmospheric moisture in the Namib Desert, Atmos. Res., 87, 362–368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.015, 2008. a, b

Kaseke, K. F., Tian, C., Wang, L., Seely, M., Vogt, R., Wassenaar, T., and Mushi, R.: Fog Spatial Distributions over the Central Namib Desert – An Isotope Approach, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0062, 2017a. a

Kaseke, K. F., Wang, L., and Seely, M. K.: Nonrainfall water origins and formation mechanisms, Sci. Adv., 3, e1603131, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603131, 2017b. a, b

Kim, M., Lee, J., and Im, J.: Deep learning-based monitoring of overshooting cloud tops from geostationary satellite data, Gisci. Remote Sens., 55, 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1457201, 2018. a

Lancaster, J., Lancaster, N., and Seely, M. K.: Climate of the central Namib desert, Madoqua, 14, 5–61, 1984. a

Lee, J. R., Chung, C. Y., and Ou, M. L.: Fog detection using geostationary satellite data: Temporally continuous algorithm, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 113–122, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0002-2, 2011. a, b

McHugh, T. A., Morrissey, E. M., Reed, S. C., Hungate, B. A., and Schwartz, E.: Water from air: An overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid regions, Sci. Rep., 5, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13767, 2015. a

Nilo, S., Romano, F., Cermak, J., Cimini, D., Ricciardelli, E., Cersosimo, A., Di Paola, F., Gallucci, D., Gentile, S., Geraldi, E., Larosa, S., Ripepi, E., and Viggiano, M.: Fog Detection Based on Meteosat Second Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager High Resolution Visible Channel, Remote Sensing, 10, 541, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040541, 2018. a, b, c

Olivier, J.: Spatial distribution of fog in the Namib, J. Arid Environ., 29, 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80084-9, 1995.  a, b, c, d, e

Olivier, J. and Stockton, P. L.: The influence of upwelling extent upon fog incidence at Lüderitz, southern Africa, Int. J. Climatol., 9, 69–75, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370090106, 1989. a

Prewitt, J. M. S. and Mendelsohn, M. L.: The Analysis of Cell Images*, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 128, 1035–1053, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x, 1966. a

Roth-Nebelsick, A., Ebner, M., Miranda, T., Gottschalk, V., Voigt, D., Gorb, S., Stegmaier, T., Sarsour, J., Linke, M., and Konrad, W.: Leaf surface structures enable the endemic Namib desert grass Stipagrostis sabulicola to irrigate itself with fog water, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 1965–74, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0847, 2012. a

Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and Ratier, A.: An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0977:AITMSG>2.3.CO;2, 2002. a

Seely, M. K.: Irregular fog as a water source for desert dune beetles, Oecologia, 42, 213–227, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344858, 1979. a, b

Shanyengana, E.: Exploring fog as a supplementary water source in Namibia, Atmos. Res., 64, 251–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0, 2002. a, b

Strabala, K. I., Ackerman, S. A., and Menzel, W. P.: Cloud Properties inferred from 8–12 µm Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 33, 212–229, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0212:CPIFD>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a

Tardif, R. and Rasmussen, R. M.: Event-based climatology and typology of fog in the New York City region, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 46, 1141–1168, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2516.1, 2007. a

Toussaint, G. T.: The use of context in pattern recognition, Pattern Recogn., 10, 189–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(78)90027-4, 1978. a

van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F., Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., and Yu, T.: scikit-image: image processing in Python, PeerJ, 2, e453, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453, 2014. a, b

Wærsted, E. G., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Delanoë, J., and Dubuisson, P.: Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid water based on ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10811–10835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017, 2017. a

Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., and Simoncelli, E. P.: Wavelets for Image Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE T. Image Process., 13, 600–612, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861, 2004. a, b

Zhu, Z. and Woodcock, C. E.: Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 83–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028, 2012. a

Special issue