Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Volume 11, issue 2 | Copyright
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 709-720, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-709-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 07 Feb 2018

Research article | 07 Feb 2018

Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring

Leigh R. Crilley et al.
Related authors
Global impact of nitrate photolysis in sea-salt aerosol on NOx, OH, and O3 in the marine boundary layer
Prasad Kasibhatla, Tomás Sherwen, Mathew J. Evans, Lucy J. Carpenter, Chris Reed, Becky Alexander, Qianjie Chen, Melissa P. Sulprizio, James D. Lee, Katie A. Read, William Bloss, Leigh R. Crilley, William C. Keene, Alexander A. P. Pszenny, and Alma Hodzic
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11185-11203, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11185-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11185-2018, 2018
Surface–atmosphere exchange of water-soluble gases and aerosols above agricultural grassland pre- and post-fertilisation
Robbie Ramsay, Chiara F. Di Marco, Mathew R. Heal, Marsailidh M. Twigg, Nicholas Cowan, Matthew R. Jones, Sarah R. Leeson, William J. Bloss, Louisa J. Kramer, Leigh Crilley, Matthias Sörgel, Meinrat Andreae, and Eiko Nemitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-603,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-603, 2018
Manuscript under review for ACP
Evidence for renoxification in the tropical marine boundary layer
Chris Reed, Mathew J. Evans, Leigh R. Crilley, William J. Bloss, Tomás Sherwen, Katie A. Read, James D. Lee, and Lucy J. Carpenter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4081-4092, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4081-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4081-2017, 2017
HONO measurement by differential photolysis
Chris Reed, Charlotte A. Brumby, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, William J. Bloss, Paul W. Seakins, James D. Lee, and Lucy J. Carpenter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2483-2495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2483-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2483-2016, 2016
Insights into the growth of newly formed particles in a subtropical urban environment
F. Salimi, L. R. Crilley, S. Stevanovic, Z. Ristovski, M. Mazaheri, C. He, G. Johnson, G. Ayoko, and L. Morawska
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13475-13485, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13475-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13475-2015, 2015
Related subject area
Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Photocurrent modelling and experimental confirmation for meteoric smoke particle detectors on board atmospheric sounding rockets
Gabriel Giono, Boris Strelnikov, Heiner Asmus, Tristan Staszak, Nickolay Ivchenko, and Franz-Josef Lübken
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5299-5314, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5299-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5299-2018, 2018
Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments
Tongshu Zheng, Michael H. Bergin, Karoline K. Johnson, Sachchida N. Tripathi, Shilpa Shirodkar, Matthew S. Landis, Ronak Sutaria, and David E. Carlson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4823-4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018, 2018
Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado
Stephen Feinberg, Ron Williams, Gayle S. W. Hagler, Joshua Rickard, Ryan Brown, Daniel Garver, Greg Harshfield, Phillip Stauffer, Erick Mattson, Robert Judge, and Sam Garvey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4605-4615, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018, 2018
Determining the link between hygroscopicity and composition for semi-volatile aerosol species
Joel Alroe, Luke T. Cravigan, Marc D. Mallet, Zoran D. Ristovski, Branka Miljevic, Chiemeriwo G. Osuagwu, and Graham R. Johnson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4361-4372, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4361-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4361-2018, 2018
HOVERCAT: a novel aerial system for evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions
Jessie M. Creamean, Katherine M. Primm, Margaret A. Tolbert, Emrys G. Hall, Jim Wendell, Allen Jordan, Patrick J. Sheridan, Jedediah Smith, and Russell C. Schnell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3969-3985, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3969-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3969-2018, 2018
Cited articles
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, 2008.
Castellini, S., Moroni, B., and Cappelletti, D.: PMetro: Measurement of urban aerosols on a mobile platform, Measurement, 49, 99–106, 2014.
Charron, A., Harrison, R. M., Moorcroft, S., and Booker, J.: Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmos. Environ., 38, 415–423, 2004.
de Nazelle, A., Bode, O., and Orjuela, J. P.: Comparison of air pollution exposures in active vs. passive travel modes in European cities: A quantitative review, Environ. Int., 99, 151–160, 2017.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The affordability and small size of low-cost particle sensors make them attractive for air pollution experiments that require multiple instruments, or take place in hard-to-access locations or low-income countries. For any sensor to be useful, its accuracy and precision need to be known. We evaluate the Alphasense OPC-N2 for monitoring airborne particles at typical UK urban background sites. The devices were found to be accurate provided they are correctly calibrated.
The affordability and small size of low-cost particle sensors make them attractive for air...
Citation
Share