Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
AMT | Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 819–833, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-819-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Observing Atmosphere and Climate with Occultation Techniques...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 819–833, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-819-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 13 Feb 2018

Research article | 13 Feb 2018

Evaluation of atmospheric profiles derived from single- and zero-difference excess phase processing of BeiDou radio occultation data from the FY-3C GNOS mission

Weihua Bai et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,008 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
669 306 33 1,008 25 35
  • HTML: 669
  • PDF: 306
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 1,008
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 974 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 959 with geography defined and 15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 21 Sep 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this study we focus on evaluating zero-difference processing of BDS RO data vs. single-difference processing. From the statistics, average bias (and standard deviation) of the bending angle and refractivity profiles were found to be as small as about 0.05–0.2 % (and 0.7–1.6 %) over the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, including for the GEO, IGSO, and MEO subsets. Zero differencing was found to perform slightly better, as may be expected from its lower vulnerability to noise.
In this study we focus on evaluating zero-difference processing of BDS RO data vs....
Citation