Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Volume 11, issue 2 | Copyright

Special issue: Observing Atmosphere and Climate with Occultation Techniques...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 819-833, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-819-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 13 Feb 2018

Research article | 13 Feb 2018

Evaluation of atmospheric profiles derived from single- and zero-difference excess phase processing of BeiDou radio occultation data from the FY-3C GNOS mission

Weihua Bai et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
548 195 26 769 24 33
  • HTML: 548
  • PDF: 195
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 769
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jun 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 768 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 755 with geography defined and 13 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved (final revised paper)
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 22 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
In this study we focus on evaluating zero-difference processing of BDS RO data vs. single-difference processing. From the statistics, average bias (and standard deviation) of the bending angle and refractivity profiles were found to be as small as about 0.05–0.2 % (and 0.7–1.6 %) over the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, including for the GEO, IGSO, and MEO subsets. Zero differencing was found to perform slightly better, as may be expected from its lower vulnerability to noise.
In this study we focus on evaluating zero-difference processing of BDS RO data vs....
Citation
Share