Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year
    3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore
    3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 60 Scimago H
    index 60
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
AMT | Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2665-2677, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2665-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: The 10th International Carbon Dioxide Conference (ICDC10)...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2665-2677, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2665-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 09 May 2019

Research article | 09 May 2019

Characterization of a commercial lower-cost medium-precision non-dispersive infrared sensor for atmospheric CO2 monitoring in urban areas

Emmanuel Arzoumanian et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 869 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
629 231 9 869 28 7 11
  • HTML: 629
  • PDF: 231
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 869
  • Supplement: 28
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Oct 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 757 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 753 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Jun 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We tested commercial lower-cost CO2 sensors in laboratory and field studies to see if they can measure atmospheric CO2 mole fractions with less than 1 ppm bias (with monthly calibration), to allow continuous urban CO2 monitoring. We find that the sensors' CO2 readings are influenced by temperature, atmospheric pressure and water vapour content, but this can be corrected for by adding sensors (T, p, RH) and carefully calibrating each sensor against a high-precision instrument.
We tested commercial lower-cost CO2 sensors in laboratory and field studies to see if they can...
Citation