Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
AMT | Articles | Volume 12, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2745–2817, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2745-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2745–2817, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2745-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 14 May 2019

Research article | 14 May 2019

Is a scaling factor required to obtain closure between measured and modelled atmospheric O4 absorptions? An assessment of uncertainties of measurements and radiative transfer simulations for 2 selected days during the MAD-CAT campaign

Thomas Wagner et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 985 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
717 257 11 985 18 10
  • HTML: 717
  • PDF: 257
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 985
  • BibTeX: 18
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 848 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 836 with geography defined and 12 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Aug 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this study the consistency between MAX-DOAS measurements and radiative transfer simulations of the atmospheric O4 absorption is investigated. The study is based on measurements (2 selected days during the MADCAT campaign) as well as synthetic spectra. The uncertainties of all relevant aspects (spectral retrieval and radiative transfer simulations) are quantified. For one of the selected days, measurements and simulations do not agree within their uncertainties.
In this study the consistency between MAX-DOAS measurements and radiative transfer simulations...
Citation