Articles | Volume 12, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5927-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5927-2019
Research article
 | 
11 Nov 2019
Research article |  | 11 Nov 2019

Cross-comparison of cloud liquid water path derived from observations by two space-borne and one ground-based instrument in northern Europe

Vladimir S. Kostsov, Anke Kniffka, Martin Stengel, and Dmitry V. Ionov

Related authors

Retrieval of the land-sea contrast of cloud liquid water path by applying a physical inversion algorithm to combined zenith and off-zenith ground-based microwave measurements
Vladimir Kostsov, Dmitry Ionov, and Anke Kniffka
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-415,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-415, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
The CO2 integral emission by the megacity of St Petersburg as quantified from ground-based FTIR measurements combined with dispersion modelling
Dmitry V. Ionov, Maria V. Makarova, Frank Hase, Stefani C. Foka, Vladimir S. Kostsov, Carlos Alberti, Thomas Blumenstock, Thorsten Warneke, and Yana A. Virolainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10939–10963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10939-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10939-2021, 2021
Short summary
Inter-annual, seasonal and diurnal features of the cloud liquid water path over the land surface and various water bodies in Northern Europe as obtained from the satellite observations by the SEVIRI instrument in 2011–2017
Vladimir S. Kostsov, Anke Kniffka, and Dmitry V. Ionov
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-387,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-387, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Emission Monitoring Mobile Experiment (EMME): an overview and first results of the St. Petersburg megacity campaign 2019
Maria V. Makarova, Carlos Alberti, Dmitry V. Ionov, Frank Hase, Stefani C. Foka, Thomas Blumenstock, Thorsten Warneke, Yana A. Virolainen, Vladimir S. Kostsov, Matthias Frey, Anatoly V. Poberovskii, Yuri M. Timofeyev, Nina N. Paramonova, Kristina A. Volkova, Nikita A. Zaitsev, Egor Y. Biryukov, Sergey I. Osipov, Boris K. Makarov, Alexander V. Polyakov, Viktor M. Ivakhov, Hamud Kh. Imhasin, and Eugene F. Mikhailov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1047-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1047-2021, 2021
Short summary
Detection of the cloud liquid water path horizontal inhomogeneity in a coastline area by means of ground-based microwave observations: feasibility study
Vladimir S. Kostsov, Dmitry V. Ionov, and Anke Kniffka
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4565–4587, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4565-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4565-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Comparing FY-2F/CTA products to ground-based manual total cloud cover observations in Xinjiang under complex underlying surfaces and different weather conditions
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Model-based evaluation of cloud geometry and droplet size retrievals from two-dimensional polarized measurements of specMACS
Lea Volkmer, Veronika Pörtge, Fabian Jakub, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1703–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved RepVGG ground-based cloud image classification with attention convolution
Chaojun Shi, Leile Han, Ke Zhang, Hongyin Xiang, Xingkuan Li, Zibo Su, and Xian Zheng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 979–997, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024, 2024
Short summary
An intercomparison of EarthCARE cloud, aerosol, and precipitation retrieval products
Shannon L. Mason, Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Nicole Docter, David P. Donovan, Robin J. Hogan, Anja Hünerbein, Pavlos Kollias, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Zhipeng Qu, Ulla Wandinger, and Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 875–898, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024, 2024
Short summary
First results of cloud retrieval from the Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer
Bo-Ram Kim, Gyuyeon Kim, Minjeong Cho, Yong-Sang Choi, and Jhoon Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 453–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-453-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-453-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Dong, X., Minnis, P., Mace, G., Smith, W. L., Poellot, M., Marchand, R. T., and Rapp, A. D.: Comparison of stratus cloud properties deduced from surface, GOES, and aircraft data during the March 2000 ARM cloud IOP, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 3265–3284, 2002. 
EUMETSAT CM SAF Climate Monitoring, https://www.cmsaf.eu, last access: 15 May 2019. 
Greuell, W. and Roebeling, R. A.: Toward a Standard Procedure for Validation of Satellite-Derived Cloud Liquid Water Path: A Study with SEVIRI Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1575–1590, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2112.1, 2009. 
GSHHG: A Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Geography Database, Version 2.3.7 Released June 15, 2017, available at: https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/pwessel/gshhg/, last access: 15 July 2019. 
Jolivet, D. and Feijt, A. J.: Quantification of the accuracy of liquid water path fields derived from NOAA 16 advanced very high resolution radiometer over three ground stations using microwave radiometers, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D11204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005205, 2005. 
Download
Short summary
Cloud liquid water path (LWP) is one of the target atmospheric parameters retrieved remotely from ground-based and space-borne platforms. The LWP data delivered by the satellite instruments SEVIRI and AVHRR together with the data provided by the ground-based radiometer RPG-HATPRO near St. Petersburg, Russia, have been compared. Our study revealed considerable differences between LWP data from SEVIRI and AVHRR in winter over ice-covered relatively small water bodies in this region.