Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods
Minxing Si
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, T2N 1N4, NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
Tetra Tech Canada Inc., 140 Quarry Park Blvd, T2C 3G3, Calgary, AB, Canada
Ying Xiong
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, T2N 1N4, NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
Department of Computer Science, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road,
Thunder Bay, P7B 5E1, ON, Canada,
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, T2N 1N4, NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,713 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,322 | 1,320 | 71 | 3,713 | 69 | 60 |
- HTML: 2,322
- PDF: 1,320
- XML: 71
- Total: 3,713
- BibTeX: 69
- EndNote: 60
Total article views: 3,075 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Apr 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,042 | 968 | 65 | 3,075 | 66 | 56 |
- HTML: 2,042
- PDF: 968
- XML: 65
- Total: 3,075
- BibTeX: 66
- EndNote: 56
Total article views: 638 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
280 | 352 | 6 | 638 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 280
- PDF: 352
- XML: 6
- Total: 638
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,713 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,305 with geography defined
and 408 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,075 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,768 with geography defined
and 307 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 638 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 537 with geography defined
and 101 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
49 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Analyzing and Improving the Performance of a Particulate Matter Low Cost Air Quality Monitoring Device E. Bagkis et al. 10.3390/atmos12020251
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Sampling Trade-Offs in Duty-Cycled Systems for Air Quality Low-Cost Sensors P. Ferrer-Cid et al. 10.3390/s22103964
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Calibrating low-cost sensors using MERRA-2 reconstructed PM2.5 mass concentration as a proxy V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.102027
- Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Transport Within a Coupled Fire‐Atmosphere Model Using a High‐Density Observation Network for an Episodic Smoke Event Along Utah's Wasatch Front D. Mallia et al. 10.1029/2020JD032712
- Investigating the Sensitivity of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Particle Number Concentrations across Diverse Atmospheric Conditions in Greece and Spain G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/s23146541
- Application of machine learning approaches in the analysis of mass absorption cross-section of black carbon aerosols: Aerosol composition dependencies and sensitivity analyses A. May & H. Li 10.1080/02786826.2022.2114312
- Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements Scarcity M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3362962
- Low-Cost Formaldehyde Sensor Evaluation and Calibration in a Controlled Environment A. Chattopadhyay et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3172864
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- A Smoke Chamber Study on Some Low-Cost Sensors for Monitoring Size-Segregated Aerosol and Microclimatic Parameters L. Bencs & A. Nagy 10.3390/atmos15030304
- A machine learning field calibration method for improving the performance of low-cost particle sensors S. Patra et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107457
- A scalable deep learning system for monitoring and forecasting pollutant concentration levels on UK highways T. Akinosho et al. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101609
- Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India S. V et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
- Evaluation of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models K. Aula et al. 10.1145/3512889
- Evaluation and calibration of low‐cost off‐the‐shelf particulate matter sensors using machine learning techniques M. Ghamari et al. 10.1049/wss2.12043
- Significance of sources and size distribution on calibration of low-cost particle sensors: Evidence from a field sampling campaign V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106114
- Intelligent PM 2.5 mass concentration analyzer using deep learning algorithm and improved density measurement chip for high-accuracy airborne particle sensor network S. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106097
- Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+ Years of Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring in Accra, Ghana G. Raheja et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c09264
- Apis-Prime: A deep learning model to optimize beehive monitoring system for the task of daily weight estimation O. Anwar et al. 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110546
- Development of a physics-based method for calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors and comparison with machine learning models B. Prajapati et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106284
- Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor B. Nilson et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022
- Voice Calibration Using Ambient Sensors J. Chen et al. 10.1142/S0218126623500433
- Evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for respirable coal mine dust monitoring Z. Feng et al. 10.1080/02786826.2023.2288609
- Characterisation and calibration of low-cost PM sensors at high temporal resolution to reference-grade performance F. Bulot et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15943
- Calibration method of particulate matter sensor based on density peaks clustering combined with stacking algorithm J. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120460
- Utilization of scattering and absorption-based particulate matter sensors in the environment impacted by residential wood combustion J. Kuula et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105671
- Constrained Tiny Machine Learning for Predicting Gas Concentration with I4.0 Low-cost Sensors M. Adoui et al. 10.1145/3590956
- City Wide Participatory Sensing of Air Quality A. Rebeiro-Hargrave et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.773778
- EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304366
- Missing Data Imputation on IoT Sensor Networks: Implications for on-Site Sensor Calibration N. Okafor & D. Delaney 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3105442
- Evaluating the performance and influencing factors of three portable black carbon monitors for field measurement L. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.044
- Assessment and Calibration of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Using Machine Learning (HybridLSTM Neural Network): Feasibility Study to Build an Air Quality Monitoring System D. Park et al. 10.3390/atmos12101306
- Assessment of the Performance of a Low-Cost Air Quality Monitor in an Indoor Environment through Different Calibration Models D. Suriano & M. Penza 10.3390/atmos13040567
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- A dynamic spatial filtering approach to mitigate underestimation bias in field calibrated low-cost sensor air pollution data C. Heffernan et al. 10.1214/23-AOAS1751
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor V. Kumar & M. Sahu 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
- Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring R. Kureshi et al. 10.3390/s22031093
- Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter M. Chacón-Mateos et al. 10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
- Real-time indoor sensing of volatile organic compounds during building disinfection events via photoionization detection and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry X. Ding et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110953
- A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
- Assessing Deep Learning Techniques for the Recognition of Tropical Disease in Images from Parasitological Exams A. Akram Abdulrazzaq et al. 10.1155/2022/2682287
- Quantitative Analysis for Application Specific Calibration Approaches for Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring M. Narayana et al. 10.1541/ieejeiss.142.1166
47 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Analyzing and Improving the Performance of a Particulate Matter Low Cost Air Quality Monitoring Device E. Bagkis et al. 10.3390/atmos12020251
- Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
- Sampling Trade-Offs in Duty-Cycled Systems for Air Quality Low-Cost Sensors P. Ferrer-Cid et al. 10.3390/s22103964
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Calibrating low-cost sensors using MERRA-2 reconstructed PM2.5 mass concentration as a proxy V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.102027
- Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Transport Within a Coupled Fire‐Atmosphere Model Using a High‐Density Observation Network for an Episodic Smoke Event Along Utah's Wasatch Front D. Mallia et al. 10.1029/2020JD032712
- Investigating the Sensitivity of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Particle Number Concentrations across Diverse Atmospheric Conditions in Greece and Spain G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/s23146541
- Application of machine learning approaches in the analysis of mass absorption cross-section of black carbon aerosols: Aerosol composition dependencies and sensitivity analyses A. May & H. Li 10.1080/02786826.2022.2114312
- Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements Scarcity M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3362962
- Low-Cost Formaldehyde Sensor Evaluation and Calibration in a Controlled Environment A. Chattopadhyay et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3172864
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing H. Mei et al. 10.3390/s20164381
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- A Smoke Chamber Study on Some Low-Cost Sensors for Monitoring Size-Segregated Aerosol and Microclimatic Parameters L. Bencs & A. Nagy 10.3390/atmos15030304
- A machine learning field calibration method for improving the performance of low-cost particle sensors S. Patra et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107457
- A scalable deep learning system for monitoring and forecasting pollutant concentration levels on UK highways T. Akinosho et al. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101609
- Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India S. V et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
- Evaluation of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models K. Aula et al. 10.1145/3512889
- Evaluation and calibration of low‐cost off‐the‐shelf particulate matter sensors using machine learning techniques M. Ghamari et al. 10.1049/wss2.12043
- Significance of sources and size distribution on calibration of low-cost particle sensors: Evidence from a field sampling campaign V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106114
- Intelligent PM 2.5 mass concentration analyzer using deep learning algorithm and improved density measurement chip for high-accuracy airborne particle sensor network S. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106097
- Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+ Years of Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring in Accra, Ghana G. Raheja et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c09264
- Apis-Prime: A deep learning model to optimize beehive monitoring system for the task of daily weight estimation O. Anwar et al. 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110546
- Development of a physics-based method for calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors and comparison with machine learning models B. Prajapati et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106284
- Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor B. Nilson et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022
- Voice Calibration Using Ambient Sensors J. Chen et al. 10.1142/S0218126623500433
- Evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for respirable coal mine dust monitoring Z. Feng et al. 10.1080/02786826.2023.2288609
- Characterisation and calibration of low-cost PM sensors at high temporal resolution to reference-grade performance F. Bulot et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15943
- Calibration method of particulate matter sensor based on density peaks clustering combined with stacking algorithm J. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120460
- Utilization of scattering and absorption-based particulate matter sensors in the environment impacted by residential wood combustion J. Kuula et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105671
- Constrained Tiny Machine Learning for Predicting Gas Concentration with I4.0 Low-cost Sensors M. Adoui et al. 10.1145/3590956
- City Wide Participatory Sensing of Air Quality A. Rebeiro-Hargrave et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.773778
- EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304366
- Missing Data Imputation on IoT Sensor Networks: Implications for on-Site Sensor Calibration N. Okafor & D. Delaney 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3105442
- Evaluating the performance and influencing factors of three portable black carbon monitors for field measurement L. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.044
- Assessment and Calibration of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Using Machine Learning (HybridLSTM Neural Network): Feasibility Study to Build an Air Quality Monitoring System D. Park et al. 10.3390/atmos12101306
- Assessment of the Performance of a Low-Cost Air Quality Monitor in an Indoor Environment through Different Calibration Models D. Suriano & M. Penza 10.3390/atmos13040567
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network E. Considine et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
- A dynamic spatial filtering approach to mitigate underestimation bias in field calibrated low-cost sensor air pollution data C. Heffernan et al. 10.1214/23-AOAS1751
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor V. Kumar & M. Sahu 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
- Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring R. Kureshi et al. 10.3390/s22031093
- Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter M. Chacón-Mateos et al. 10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
- Real-time indoor sensing of volatile organic compounds during building disinfection events via photoionization detection and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry X. Ding et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110953
- A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Assessing Deep Learning Techniques for the Recognition of Tropical Disease in Images from Parasitological Exams A. Akram Abdulrazzaq et al. 10.1155/2022/2682287
- Quantitative Analysis for Application Specific Calibration Approaches for Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring M. Narayana et al. 10.1541/ieejeiss.142.1166
Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Short summary
The study evaluated the performance of a low-cost PM sensor in ambient conditions and calibrated its readings using simple linear regression (SLR), multiple linear regression (MLR), and two more powerful machine-learning algorithms with random search techniques for the best model architectures. The two machine-learning algorithms are XGBoost and a feedforward neural network (NN).
The study evaluated the performance of a low-cost PM sensor in ambient conditions and calibrated...