Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
Research article
 | 
23 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 23 Apr 2020

Shallow cumuli cover and its uncertainties from ground-based lidar–radar data and sky images

Erin A. Riley, Jessica M. Kleiss, Laura D. Riihimaki, Charles N. Long, Larry K. Berg, and Evgueni Kassianov

Related authors

Shortwave Array Spectroradiometer-Hemispheric (SAS-He): Design and Evaluation
Evgueni Kassianov, Connor Flynn, James Barnard, Brian Ermold, and Jennifer Comstock
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-13,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-13, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Tracking precipitation features and associated large-scale environments over southeastern Texas
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, Larry K. Berg, Zhe Feng, Jianfeng Li, Jingyi Chen, and Zhao Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-112,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-112, 2024
Short summary
Year-long buoy-based observations of the air–sea transition zone off the US west coast
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Evgueni I. Kassianov, Jinliang Liu, Rob K. Newsom, Lindsay M. Sheridan, and Alicia M. Mahon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Lessons learned in coupling atmospheric models across scales for onshore and offshore wind energy
Sue Ellen Haupt, Branko Kosović, Larry K. Berg, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Churchfield, Jeffrey Mirocha, Dries Allaerts, Thomas Brummet, Shannon Davis, Amy DeCastro, Susan Dettling, Caroline Draxl, David John Gagne, Patrick Hawbecker, Pankaj Jha, Timothy Juliano, William Lassman, Eliot Quon, Raj K. Rai, Michael Robinson, William Shaw, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1251–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of the hyperspectral radiometer (HSR1) at the ARM SGP site
Kelly A. Balmes, Laura D. Riihimaki, John Wood, Connor Flynn, Adam Theisen, Michael Ritsche, Lynn Ma, Gary B. Hodges, and Christian Herrera
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-115,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-115, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for AMT
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Investigation of cirrus cloud properties in the tropical tropopause layer using high-altitude limb-scanning near-IR spectroscopy during NASA-ATTREX
Santo Fedele Colosimo, Nathaniel Brockway, Vijay Natraj, Robert Spurr, Klaus Pfeilsticker, Lisa Scalone, Max Spolaor, Sarah Woods, and Jochen Stutz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2367–2385, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparing FY-2F/CTA products to ground-based manual total cloud cover observations in Xinjiang under complex underlying surfaces and different weather conditions
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Model-based evaluation of cloud geometry and droplet size retrievals from two-dimensional polarized measurements of specMACS
Lea Volkmer, Veronika Pörtge, Fabian Jakub, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1703–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved RepVGG ground-based cloud image classification with attention convolution
Chaojun Shi, Leile Han, Ke Zhang, Hongyin Xiang, Xingkuan Li, Zibo Su, and Xian Zheng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 979–997, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024, 2024
Short summary
An intercomparison of EarthCARE cloud, aerosol, and precipitation retrieval products
Shannon L. Mason, Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Nicole Docter, David P. Donovan, Robin J. Hogan, Anja Hünerbein, Pavlos Kollias, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Zhipeng Qu, Ulla Wandinger, and Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 875–898, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Angevine, W. M., Olson, J., Kenyon, J., Gustafson, W. I., Endo, S., Suselj, K., and Turner, D. D.: Shallow Cumulus in WRF Parameterizations Evaluated against LASSO Large-Eddy Simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 4303–4322, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0115.1, 2018. 
Arakawa, A.: The Cumulus Parameterization Problem: Past, Present, and Future, J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2493:RATCPP>2.0.CO;2, 2004. 
ARM: ARM Best Estimate Data Pproducts (ARMBE) at Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility, available at: https://www.arm.gov/capabilities/vaps/armbe (last access: 25 February 2019), 1994. 
Astin, I., Girolamo, L. D., and van de Poll, H. M.: Bayesian confidence intervals for true fractional coverage from finite transect measurements: Implications for cloud studies from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 17303–17310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900168, 2001. 
Atkinson, B. W. and Zhang, J. W.: Mesoscale shallow convection in the atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 34, 403–431, https://doi.org/10.1029/96RG02623, 1996. 
Download
Short summary
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection differences contribute to long-term bias in shallow cumuli cover estimates, whereas narrow field-of-view configurations impact measurement uncertainty as averaging time decreases. A new tool is introduced to visually assess both impacts on sub-hourly cloud cover estimates. Accurate shallow cumuli cover estimation is needed for model–observation comparisons and studying cloud-surface interactions.