Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020
Research article
 | 
08 May 2020
Research article |  | 08 May 2020

Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222Rn and 222Rn progeny monitors

Claudia Grossi, Scott D. Chambers, Olivier Llido, Felix R. Vogel, Victor Kazan, Alessandro Capuana, Sylvester Werczynski, Roger Curcoll, Marc Delmotte, Arturo Vargas, Josep-Anton Morguí, Ingeborg Levin, and Michel Ramonet

Viewed

Total article views: 2,201 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,406 745 50 2,201 289 41 38
  • HTML: 1,406
  • PDF: 745
  • XML: 50
  • Total: 2,201
  • Supplement: 289
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,201 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,004 with geography defined and 197 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
The sustainable support of radon metrology at the environmental level offers new scientific possibilities for the quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the determination of their source terms as well as for the identification of radioactive sources for the assessment of radiation exposure. This study helps to harmonize the techniques commonly used for atmospheric radon and radon progeny activity concentration measurements.