Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Edie, Rachel; Robertson, Anna M.; Field, Robert A.; Soltis, Jeffrey; Snare, Dustin A.; Zimmerle, Daniel; Bell, Clay S.; Vaughn, Timothy L.; Murphy, Shane M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020

Articles | Volume 13, issue 1

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 1

Research article

|

31 Jan 2020

Research article |

| 31 Jan 2020

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Rachel Edie, Anna M. Robertson, Robert A. Field, Jeffrey Soltis, Dustin A. Snare, Daniel Zimmerle, Clay S. Bell, Timothy L. Vaughn, and Shane M. Murphy

Download

Final revised paper (published on 31 Jan 2020)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 15 Aug 2019)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of Edie et al. AMT 2019', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Sep 2019
- AC1: 'Author response to anonymous referee #1', Shane Murphy, 21 Nov 2019
RC2: 'Review of 'Constraining the Accuracy of Flux Estimates Using OTM 33A'', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2019
- AC2: 'Author response to anonymous referee #2', Shane Murphy, 21 Nov 2019

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Shane Murphy on behalf of the Authors (21 Nov 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (04 Dec 2019) by Thomas Röckmann

Short summary

Ground-based measurements of emissions from oil and natural gas production are important for understanding emission distributions and improving emission inventories. Here, measurement technique Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) is validated through several test releases staged at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center. These tests suggest OTM 33A has no inherent bias and that a group of OTM measurements is within 5 % of the known mean emission rate.