Volume 13, issue 3

Volume 13, issue 3

04 Mar 2020
Evaluation of cloud properties from reanalyses over East Asia with a radiance-based approach
Bin Yao, Chao Liu, Yan Yin, Zhiquan Liu, Chunxiang Shi, Hironobu Iwabuchi, and Fuzhong Weng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1033–1049, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1033-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1033-2020, 2020
Short summary
04 Mar 2020
Monitoring the differential reflectivity and receiver calibration of the German polarimetric weather radar network
Michael Frech and John Hubbert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1051–1069, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1051-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1051-2020, 2020
Short summary
06 Mar 2020
A comparison of lognormal and gamma size distributions for characterizing the stratospheric aerosol phase function from optical particle counter measurements
Ernest Nyaku, Robert Loughman, Pawan K. Bhartia, Terry Deshler, Zhong Chen, and Peter R. Colarco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1071–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1071-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1071-2020, 2020
Short summary
06 Mar 2020
Increasing the spatial resolution of cloud property retrievals from Meteosat SEVIRI by use of its high-resolution visible channel: evaluation of candidate approaches with MODIS observations
Frank Werner and Hartwig Deneke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1089–1111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1089-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1089-2020, 2020
Short summary
09 Mar 2020
Scanning polarization lidar LOSA-M3: opportunity for research of crystalline particle orientation in the ice clouds
Grigorii P. Kokhanenko, Yurii S. Balin, Marina G. Klemasheva, Sergei V. Nasonov, Mikhail M. Novoselov, Iogannes E. Penner, and Svetlana V. Samoilova
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1113–1127, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1113-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1113-2020, 2020
Short summary
09 Mar 2020
Validation of MAX-DOAS retrievals of aerosol extinction, SO2, and NO2 through comparison with lidar, sun photometer, active DOAS, and aircraft measurements in the Athabasca oil sands region
Zoë Y. W. Davis, Udo Frieß, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Monika Aggarwaal, Sabour Baray, Elijah G. Schnitzler, Akshay Lobo, Vitali E. Fioletov, Ihab Abboud, Chris A. McLinden, Jim Whiteway, Megan D. Willis, Alex K. Y. Lee, Jeff Brook, Jason Olfert, Jason O'Brien, Ralf Staebler, Hans D. Osthoff, Cristian Mihele, and Robert McLaren
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1129–1155, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1129-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1129-2020, 2020
Short summary
09 Mar 2020
An automated method for preparing and calibrating electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes
Francis J. Schmidlin and Bruno A. Hoegger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1157–1166, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1157-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1157-2020, 2020
Short summary
10 Mar 2020
Automatic quality control of the Meteosat First Generation measurements
Freek Liefhebber, Sarah Lammens, Paul W. G. Brussee, André Bos, Viju O. John, Frank Rüthrich, Jacobus Onderwaater, Michael G. Grant, and Jörg Schulz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1167–1179, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1167-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1167-2020, 2020
Short summary
10 Mar 2020
Effect of aerosol composition on the performance of low-cost optical particle counter correction factors
Leigh R. Crilley, Ajit Singh, Louisa J. Kramer, Marvin D. Shaw, Mohammed S. Alam, Joshua S. Apte, William J. Bloss, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz, Pingqing Fu, Weiqi Fu, Shahzad Gani, Michael Gatari, Evgenia Ilyinskaya, Alastair C. Lewis, David Ng'ang'a, Yele Sun, Rachel C. W. Whitty, Siyao Yue, Stuart Young, and Francis D. Pope
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1181–1193, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1181-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1181-2020, 2020
Short summary
11 Mar 2020
Intercomparison between the aerosol optical properties retrieved by different inversion methods from SKYNET sky radiometer observations over Qionghai and Yucheng in China
Zhe Jiang, Minzheng Duan, Huizheng Che, Wenxing Zhang, Teruyuki Nakajima, Makiko Hashimoto, Bin Chen, and Akihiro Yamazaki
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1195–1212, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1195-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1195-2020, 2020
Short summary
11 Mar 2020
Filling the gaps of in situ hourly PM2.5 concentration data with the aid of empirical orthogonal function analysis constrained by diurnal cycles
Kaixu Bai, Ke Li, Jianping Guo, Yuanjian Yang, and Ni-Bin Chang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1213–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1213-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1213-2020, 2020
Short summary
13 Mar 2020
Unsupervised classification of vertical profiles of dual polarization radar variables
Jussi Tiira and Dmitri Moisseev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1227–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1227-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1227-2020, 2020
Short summary
13 Mar 2020
Aerosol and cloud top height information of Envisat MIPAS measurements
Sabine Griessbach, Lars Hoffmann, Reinhold Spang, Peggy Achtert, Marc von Hobe, Nina Mateshvili, Rolf Müller, Martin Riese, Christian Rolf, Patric Seifert, and Jean-Paul Vernier
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1243–1271, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1243-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1243-2020, 2020
Short summary
16 Mar 2020
Microphysical properties and fall speed measurements of snow ice crystals using the Dual Ice Crystal Imager (D-ICI)
Thomas Kuhn and Sandra Vázquez-Martín
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1273–1285, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1273-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1273-2020, 2020
Short summary
18 Mar 2020
Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements from onboard the International Space Station
M. Patrick McCormick, Liqiao Lei, Michael T. Hill, John Anderson, Richard Querel, and Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1287–1297, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1287-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1287-2020, 2020
Short summary
19 Mar 2020
Calibration and validation of the Polarimetric Radio Occultation and Heavy Precipitation experiment aboard the PAZ satellite
Ramon Padullés, Chi O. Ao, F. Joseph Turk, Manuel de la Torre Juárez, Byron Iijima, Kuo Nung Wang, and Estel Cardellach
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1299–1313, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1299-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1299-2020, 2020
Short summary
23 Mar 2020
S5P TROPOMI NO2 slant column retrieval: method, stability, uncertainties and comparisons with OMI
Jos van Geffen, K. Folkert Boersma, Henk Eskes, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, Marina Zara, and J. Pepijn Veefkind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1315–1335, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020, 2020
Short summary
23 Mar 2020
Assessing Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) carbon monoxide retrievals over urban versus non-urban regions
Wenfu Tang, Helen M. Worden, Merritt N. Deeter, David P. Edwards, Louisa K. Emmons, Sara Martínez-Alonso, Benjamin Gaubert, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Glenn S. Diskin, Russell R. Dickerson, Xinrong Ren, Hao He, and Yutaka Kondo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1337–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1337-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1337-2020, 2020
24 Mar 2020
Analysis of flow in complex terrain using multi-Doppler lidar retrievals
Tyler M. Bell, Petra Klein, Norman Wildmann, and Robert Menke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1357–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1357-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1357-2020, 2020
Short summary
26 Mar 2020
Retrieval of eddy dissipation rate from derived equivalent vertical gust included in Aircraft Meteorological Data Relay (AMDAR)
Soo-Hyun Kim, Hye-Yeong Chun, Jung-Hoon Kim, Robert D. Sharman, and Matt Strahan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1373–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1373-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1373-2020, 2020
Short summary
27 Mar 2020
Evaluation of satellite-based aerosol datasets and the CAMS reanalysis over the ocean utilizing shipborne reference observations
Jonas Witthuhn, Anja Hünerbein, and Hartwig Deneke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1387–1412, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1387-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1387-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Mar 2020
Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO2 products
Ping Wang, Ankie Piters, Jos van Geffen, Olaf Tuinder, Piet Stammes, and Stefan Kinne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1413–1426, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Mar 2020
The 2018 fire season in North America as seen by TROPOMI: aerosol layer height intercomparisons and evaluation of model-derived plume heights
Debora Griffin, Christopher Sioris, Jack Chen, Nolan Dickson, Andrew Kovachik, Martin de Graaf, Swadhin Nanda, Pepijn Veefkind, Enrico Dammers, Chris A. McLinden, Paul Makar, and Ayodeji Akingunola
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1427–1445, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1427-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1427-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Mar 2020
InnFLUX – an open-source code for conventional and disjunct eddy covariance analysis of trace gas measurements: an urban test case
Marcus Striednig, Martin Graus, Tilmann D. Märk, and Thomas G. Karl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1447–1465, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1447-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1447-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Mar 2020
Testing the near-field Gaussian plume inversion flux quantification technique using unmanned aerial vehicle sampling
Adil Shah, Joseph R. Pitt, Hugo Ricketts, J. Brian Leen, Paul I. Williams, Khristopher Kabbabe, Martin W. Gallagher, and Grant Allen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1467–1484, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1467-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1467-2020, 2020
Short summary
31 Mar 2020
Ground-based observations of cloud and drizzle liquid water path in stratocumulus clouds
Maria P. Cadeddu, Virendra P. Ghate, and Mario Mech
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1485–1499, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1485-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1485-2020, 2020
Short summary
31 Mar 2020
Doppler lidar at Observatoire de Haute-Provence for wind profiling up to 75 km altitude: performance evaluation and observations
Sergey M. Khaykin, Alain Hauchecorne, Robin Wing, Philippe Keckhut, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Jacques Porteneuve, Jean-Francois Mariscal, and Jerome Schmitt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1501–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1501-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1501-2020, 2020
Short summary
31 Mar 2020
Analysis of functional groups in atmospheric aerosols by infrared spectroscopy: method development for probabilistic modeling of organic carbon and organic matter concentrations
Charlotte Bürki, Matteo Reggente, Ann M. Dillner, Jenny L. Hand, Stephanie L. Shaw, and Satoshi Takahama
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1517–1538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1517-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1517-2020, 2020
Short summary
31 Mar 2020
| Highlight paper
Real-time pollen monitoring using digital holography
Eric Sauvageat, Yanick Zeder, Kevin Auderset, Bertrand Calpini, Bernard Clot, Benoît Crouzy, Thomas Konzelmann, Gian Lieberherr, Fiona Tummon, and Konstantina Vasilatou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1539–1550, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1539-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1539-2020, 2020
Short summary
01 Apr 2020
Development of a new nanoparticle sizer equipped with a 12-channel multi-port differential mobility analyzer and multi-condensation particle counters
Hong Ku Lee, Handol Lee, and Kang-Ho Ahn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1551–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1551-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1551-2020, 2020
Short summary
01 Apr 2020
Distributed observations of wind direction using microstructures attached to actively heated fiber-optic cables
Karl Lapo, Anita Freundorfer, Lena Pfister, Johann Schneider, John Selker, and Christoph Thomas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1563–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020, 2020
Short summary
01 Apr 2020
Cloud detection over snow and ice with oxygen A- and B-band observations from the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC)
Yaping Zhou, Yuekui Yang, Meng Gao, and Peng-Wang Zhai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1575–1591, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1575-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1575-2020, 2020
Short summary
02 Apr 2020
Towards objective identification and tracking of convective outflow boundaries in next-generation geostationary satellite imagery
Jason M. Apke, Kyle A. Hilburn, Steven D. Miller, and David A. Peterson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1593–1608, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1593-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1593-2020, 2020
Short summary
02 Apr 2020
An LES-based airborne Doppler lidar simulator and its application to wind profiling in inhomogeneous flow conditions
Philipp Gasch, Andreas Wieser, Julie K. Lundquist, and Norbert Kalthoff
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1609–1631, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1609-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1609-2020, 2020
Short summary
02 Apr 2020
Comparison of GTO-ECV and adjusted MERRA-2 total ozone columns from the last 2 decades and assessment of interannual variability
Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Diego G. Loyola, Gordon Labow, and Stacey M. Frith
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1633–1654, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1633-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1633-2020, 2020
Short summary
02 Apr 2020
An instrument for in situ measurement of total ozone reactivity
Roberto Sommariva, Louisa J. Kramer, Leigh R. Crilley, Mohammed S. Alam, and William J. Bloss
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1655–1670, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1655-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1655-2020, 2020
Short summary
CC BY 4.0