Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT

Volume 13, issue 6

Volumes and issues

Volume 13, issue 6

Volumes and issues
03 Jun 2020
Towards spaceborne monitoring of localized CO2 emissions: an instrument concept and first performance assessment
Johan Strandgren, David Krutz, Jonas Wilzewski, Carsten Paproth, Ilse Sebastian, Kevin R. Gurney, Jianming Liang, Anke Roiger, and André Butz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2887–2904, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2887-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2887-2020, 2020
Short summary
03 Jun 2020
Resolving the size of ice-nucleating particles with a balloon deployable aerosol sampler: the SHARK
Grace C. E. Porter, Sebastien N. F. Sikora, Michael P. Adams, Ulrike Proske, Alexander D. Harrison, Mark D. Tarn, Ian M. Brooks, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2905–2921, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020, 2020
Short summary
05 Jun 2020
Correcting high-frequency losses of reactive nitrogen flux measurements
Pascal Wintjen, Christof Ammann, Frederik Schrader, and Christian Brümmer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2923–2948, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2923-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2923-2020, 2020
Short summary
05 Jun 2020
Unsupervised classification of snowflake images using a generative adversarial network and K-medoids classification
Jussi Leinonen and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2949–2964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2949-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2949-2020, 2020
Short summary
05 Jun 2020
Comparing lightning observations of the ground-based European lightning location system EUCLID and the space-based Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the International Space Station (ISS)
Dieter R. Poelman and Wolfgang Schulz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2965–2977, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020, 2020
Short summary
05 Jun 2020
An improved post-processing technique for automatic precipitation gauge time series
Amber Ross, Craig D. Smith, and Alan Barr
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2979–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2979-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2979-2020, 2020
Short summary
09 Jun 2020
Comparison of dimension reduction techniques in the analysis of mass spectrometry data
Sini Isokääntä, Eetu Kari, Angela Buchholz, Liqing Hao, Siegfried Schobesberger, Annele Virtanen, and Santtu Mikkonen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2995–3022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2995-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2995-2020, 2020
Short summary
09 Jun 2020
First observations of the McMurdo–South Pole oblique ionospheric HF channel
Alex T. Chartier, Juha Vierinen, and Geonhwa Jee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3023–3031, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3023-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3023-2020, 2020
Short summary
10 Jun 2020
A comparison of OH nightglow volume emission rates as measured by SCIAMACHY and SABER
Yajun Zhu, Martin Kaufmann, Qiuyu Chen, Jiyao Xu, Qiucheng Gong, Jilin Liu, Daikang Wei, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3033–3042, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3033-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3033-2020, 2020
Short summary
10 Jun 2020
A first comparison of TROPOMI aerosol layer height (ALH) to CALIOP data
Swadhin Nanda, Martin de Graaf, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, Jiyunting Sun, and Pieternel F. Levelt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3043–3059, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3043-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3043-2020, 2020
Short summary
11 Jun 2020
A hybrid method for reconstructing the historical evolution of aerosol optical depth from sunshine duration measurements
William Wandji Nyamsi, Antti Lipponen, Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo, Martin Wild, and Antti Arola
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3061–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3061-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3061-2020, 2020
Short summary
11 Jun 2020
Evaluation of the 15-year ROM SAF monthly mean GPS radio occultation climate data record
Hans Gleisner, Kent B. Lauritsen, Johannes K. Nielsen, and Stig Syndergaard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3081-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3081-2020, 2020
Short summary
12 Jun 2020
The development of the Atmospheric Measurements by Ultra-Light Spectrometer (AMULSE) greenhouse gas profiling system and application for satellite retrieval validation
Lilian Joly, Olivier Coopmann, Vincent Guidard, Thomas Decarpenterie, Nicolas Dumelié, Julien Cousin, Jérémie Burgalat, Nicolas Chauvin, Grégory Albora, Rabih Maamary, Zineb Miftah El Khair, Diane Tzanos, Joël Barrié, Éric Moulin, Patrick Aressy, and Anne Belleudy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3099–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3099-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3099-2020, 2020
Short summary
12 Jun 2020
Implementation of a chemical background method for atmospheric OH measurements by laser-induced fluorescence: characterisation and observations from the UK and China
Robert Woodward-Massey, Eloise J. Slater, Jake Alen, Trevor Ingham, Danny R. Cryer, Leanne M. Stimpson, Chunxiang Ye, Paul W. Seakins, Lisa K. Whalley, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3119–3146, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3119-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3119-2020, 2020
Short summary
15 Jun 2020
An extended radar relative calibration adjustment (eRCA) technique for higher-frequency radars and range–height indicator (RHI) scans
Alexis Hunzinger, Joseph C. Hardin, Nitin Bharadwaj, Adam Varble, and Alyssa Matthews
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3147–3166, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3147-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3147-2020, 2020
Short summary
16 Jun 2020
Correcting the impact of the isotope composition on the mixing ratio dependency of water vapour isotope measurements with cavity ring-down spectrometers
Yongbiao Weng, Alexandra Touzeau, and Harald Sodemann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3167–3190, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3167-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3167-2020, 2020
Short summary
18 Jun 2020
Photophoretic spectroscopy in atmospheric chemistry – high-sensitivity measurements of light absorption by a single particle
Nir Bluvshtein, Ulrich K. Krieger, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3191–3203, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3191-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3191-2020, 2020
Short summary
18 Jun 2020
Mass spectral characterization of primary emissions and implications in source apportionment of organic aerosol
Weiqi Xu, Yao He, Yanmei Qiu, Chun Chen, Conghui Xie, Lu Lei, Zhijie Li, Jiaxing Sun, Junyao Li, Pingqing Fu, Zifa Wang, Douglas R. Worsnop, and Yele Sun
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3205–3219, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3205-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3205-2020, 2020
Short summary
18 Jun 2020
Observation of sensible and latent heat flux profiles with lidar
Andreas Behrendt, Volker Wulfmeyer, Christoph Senff, Shravan Kumar Muppa, Florian Späth, Diego Lange, Norbert Kalthoff, and Andreas Wieser
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3221–3233, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3221-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3221-2020, 2020
Short summary
18 Jun 2020
A fast visible-wavelength 3D radiative transfer model for numerical weather prediction visualization and forward modeling
Steven Albers, Stephen M. Saleeby, Sonia Kreidenweis, Qijing Bian, Peng Xian, Zoltan Toth, Ravan Ahmadov, Eric James, and Steven D. Miller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3235–3261, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3235-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3235-2020, 2020
Short summary
19 Jun 2020
Evaluation of the MODIS Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and CALIPSO CALIOP products
Benjamin Marchant, Steven Platnick, Kerry Meyer, and Galina Wind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3263–3275, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Jun 2020
Mobile-platform measurement of air pollutant concentrations in California: performance assessment, statistical methods for evaluating spatial variations, and spatial representativeness
Paul A. Solomon, Dena Vallano, Melissa Lunden, Brian LaFranchi, Charles L. Blanchard, and Stephanie L. Shaw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3277–3301, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3277-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3277-2020, 2020
Short summary
22 Jun 2020
Can statistics of turbulent tracer dispersion be inferred from camera observations of SO2 in the ultraviolet? A modelling study
Arve Kylling, Hamidreza Ardeshiri, Massimo Cassiani, Anna Solvejg Dinger, Soon-Young Park, Ignacio Pisso, Norbert Schmidbauer, Kerstin Stebel, and Andreas Stohl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3303–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3303-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3303-2020, 2020
Short summary
22 Jun 2020
Continuous methane concentration measurements at the Greenland ice sheet–atmosphere interface using a low-cost, low-power metal oxide sensor system
Christian Juncher Jørgensen, Jacob Mønster, Karsten Fuglsang, and Jesper Riis Christiansen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3319–3328, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3319-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3319-2020, 2020
Short summary
24 Jun 2020
The use of the 1.27 µm O2 absorption band for greenhouse gas monitoring from space and application to MicroCarb
Jean-Loup Bertaux, Alain Hauchecorne, Franck Lefèvre, François-Marie Bréon, Laurent Blanot, Denis Jouglet, Pierre Lafrique, and Pavel Akaev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3329–3374, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3329-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3329-2020, 2020
Short summary
26 Jun 2020
The AERONET Version 3 aerosol retrieval algorithm, associated uncertainties and comparisons to Version 2
Alexander Sinyuk, Brent N. Holben, Thomas F. Eck, David M. Giles, Ilya Slutsker, Sergey Korkin, Joel S. Schafer, Alexander Smirnov, Mikhail Sorokin, and Alexei Lyapustin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3375–3411, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020, 2020
26 Jun 2020
Cézeaux-Aulnat-Opme-Puy De Dôme: a multi-site for the long-term survey of the tropospheric composition and climate change
Jean-Luc Baray, Laurent Deguillaume, Aurélie Colomb, Karine Sellegri, Evelyn Freney, Clémence Rose, Joël Van Baelen, Jean-Marc Pichon, David Picard, Patrick Fréville, Laëtitia Bouvier, Mickaël Ribeiro, Pierre Amato, Sandra Banson, Angelica Bianco, Agnès Borbon, Lauréline Bourcier, Yannick Bras, Marcello Brigante, Philippe Cacault, Aurélien Chauvigné, Tiffany Charbouillot, Nadine Chaumerliac, Anne-Marie Delort, Marc Delmotte, Régis Dupuy, Antoine Farah, Guy Febvre, Andrea Flossmann, Christophe Gourbeyre, Claude Hervier, Maxime Hervo, Nathalie Huret, Muriel Joly, Victor Kazan, Morgan Lopez, Gilles Mailhot, Angela Marinoni, Olivier Masson, Nadège Montoux, Marius Parazols, Frédéric Peyrin, Yves Pointin, Michel Ramonet, Manon Rocco, Martine Sancelme, Stéphane Sauvage, Martina Schmidt, Emmanuel Tison, Mickaël Vaïtilingom, Paolo Villani, Miao Wang, Camille Yver-Kwok, and Paolo Laj
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3413–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3413-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3413-2020, 2020
Short summary
29 Jun 2020
Low-level liquid cloud properties during ORACLES retrieved using airborne polarimetric measurements and a neural network algorithm
Daniel J. Miller, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Jens Redemann, Brian Cairns, Mikhail Alexandrov, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, and Andrzej Wasilewski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3447–3470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3447-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3447-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Jun 2020
Evaluation of the OMPS/LP stratospheric aerosol extinction product using SAGE III/ISS observations
Zhong Chen, Pawan K. Bhartia, Omar Torres, Glen Jaross, Robert Loughman, Matthew DeLand, Peter Colarco, Robert Damadeo, and Ghassan Taha
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3471–3485, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3471-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3471-2020, 2020
Short summary
30 Jun 2020
Using global reanalysis data to quantify and correct airflow distortion bias in shipborne wind speed measurements
Sebastian Landwehr, Iris Thurnherr, Nicolas Cassar, Martin Gysel-Beer, and Julia Schmale
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3487–3506, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020, 2020
Short summary
CC BY 4.0