Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-163-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-163-2010
08 Feb 2010
 | 08 Feb 2010

Sources of uncertainty in eddy covariance ozone flux measurements made by dry chemiluminescence fast response analysers

J. B. A. Muller, C. J. Percival, M. W. Gallagher, D. Fowler, M. Coyle, and E. Nemitz

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Real-time measurement of phase partitioning of organic compounds using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer coupled to a CHARON inlet
Yarong Peng, Hongli Wang, Yaqin Gao, Shengao Jing, Shuhui Zhu, Dandan Huang, Peizhi Hao, Shengrong Lou, Tiantao Cheng, Cheng Huang, and Xuan Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 15–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023, 2023
Short summary
A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure
Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6285–6296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands
Broghan M. Erland, Cristen Adams, Andrea Darlington, Mackenzie L. Smith, Andrew K. Thorpe, Gregory R. Wentworth, Steve Conley, John Liggio, Shao-Meng Li, Charles E. Miller, and John A. Gamon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5841–5859, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of commercial analyzers for atmospheric ethane and methane observations
Roisin Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, and Lee T. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-272,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-272, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection
Daniel Furuta, Tofigh Sayahi, Jinsheng Li, Bruce Wilson, Albert A. Presto, and Jiayu Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5117–5128, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ashmore, M. R.: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation, Plant Cell Environ., 28, 949–964, 2005.
Bassin, S., Calanca, P., Weidinger, T., Gerosa, G., and Fuhrer, J.: Modeling seasonal ozone fluxes to grassland and wheat: model improvement, testing, and application, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2349–2359, 2004.
Bauer, M. R., Hultman, N. E., Panek, J. A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Ozone deposition to a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains (CA): A comparison of two different climatic years, J. Geophys. Res., 105(D17), 22123–22136, 2000.
Businger, J. A.: Evaluation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current micrometeorological techniques, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 25, 1100–1124, 1986.
Coyle, M.: The Gaseous Exchange of Ozone at Terrestrial Surfaces: Non-stomatal Deposition to Grassland, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK, 2005.
Download