Articles | Volume 3, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-723-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-723-2010
28 Jun 2010
 | 28 Jun 2010

Comparison of one- and two-filter detectors for atmospheric 222Rn measurements under various meteorological conditions

Y. Xia, H. Sartorius, C. Schlosser, U. Stöhlker, F. Conen, and W. Zahorowski

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Real-time measurement of phase partitioning of organic compounds using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer coupled to a CHARON inlet
Yarong Peng, Hongli Wang, Yaqin Gao, Shengao Jing, Shuhui Zhu, Dandan Huang, Peizhi Hao, Shengrong Lou, Tiantao Cheng, Cheng Huang, and Xuan Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 15–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023, 2023
Short summary
A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure
Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6285–6296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands
Broghan M. Erland, Cristen Adams, Andrea Darlington, Mackenzie L. Smith, Andrew K. Thorpe, Gregory R. Wentworth, Steve Conley, John Liggio, Shao-Meng Li, Charles E. Miller, and John A. Gamon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5841–5859, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of commercial analyzers for atmospheric ethane and methane observations
Roisin Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, and Lee T. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-272,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-272, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection
Daniel Furuta, Tofigh Sayahi, Jinsheng Li, Bruce Wilson, Albert A. Presto, and Jiayu Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5117–5128, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akata, N., Kawabata, H., Hasegawa, H., Sato, T., Chikuchi, Y., Kondo, K., Hisamatsu, S., and Inaba, J.: Total deposition velocities and scavenging ratios of 7Be and 210Pb at Rokkasho, Japan, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 277(2) 347–355, 2008.
Biraud, S., Ciais, P., Ramonet, M., Simmonds, P., Kazan, V., Monfray, P., O'Doherty, S., Spain, T. G., and Jennings, S. G.: European greenhouse gas emissions estimated from continuous atmospheric measurement and radon-222 at Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 1351–1366, 2000.
Brunke, E. G., Labuschagne, C., Parker, B., van der Spuy, D., and Whittlestone, S.: Cape point GAW station 222Rn detector: factors affecting sensitivity and accuracy, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2257–2262, 2002.
Collé, R., Unterweger, M. P., Hutchinson, J. M. R., Whittlestone, S., Polian, G., Ardouin, B., Kay, J. G., Friend, J. P., Blomquist, B. W., Nadler, W., Dang, T. T., Larsen, R. J., and Hutter, A. R.: An international marine-atmospheric 222Rn measurement intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the participating laboratories, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 101, 21– , 1996.
Conen, F., Neftel, A., Schmid, M., and Lehmann, B. E.: N2O/Rn-222-soil flux calibration in the stable nocturnal surface layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(2), 1025, , 2002.