Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.668 IF 3.668
  • IF 5-year value: 3.707 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore value: 6.3 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 1.383 SNIP 1.383
  • IPP value: 3.75 IPP 3.75
  • SJR value: 1.525 SJR 1.525
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 77 Scimago H
    index 77
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 5, issue 1
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 149–159, 2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 149–159, 2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 13 Jan 2012

Research article | 13 Jan 2012

Interferences of commercial NO2 instruments in the urban atmosphere and in a smog chamber

G. Villena, I. Bejan, R. Kurtenbach, P. Wiesen, and J. Kleffmann G. Villena et al.
  • Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Physikalische Chemie, Germany

Abstract. Reliable measurements of atmospheric trace gases are necessary for both, a better understanding of the chemical processes occurring in the atmosphere, and for the validation of model predictions. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a toxic gas and is thus a regulated air pollutant. Besides, it is of major importance for the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere and plays a pivotal role in the formation of ozone and acid precipitation. Detection of NO2 is a difficult task since many of the different commercial techniques used are affected by interferences. The chemiluminescence instruments that are used for indirect NO2 detection in monitoring networks and smog chambers use either molybdenum or photolytic converters and are affected by either positive (NOy) or negative interferences (radical formation in the photolytic converter). Erroneous conclusions on NO2 can be drawn if these interferences are not taken into consideration. In the present study, NO2 measurements in the urban atmosphere, in a road traffic tunnel and in a smog-chamber using different commercial techniques, i.e. chemiluminescence instruments with molybdenum or photolytic converters, a Luminol based instrument and a new NO2-LOPAP, were compared with spectroscopic techniques, i.e. DOAS and FTIR. Interferences of the different instruments observed during atmospheric measurements were partly characterised in more detail in the smog chamber experiments. Whereas all the commercial instruments showed strong interferences, excellent agreement was obtained between a new NO2-LOPAP instrument and the FTIR technique for the measurements performed in the smog chamber.

Publications Copernicus