Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-195-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-195-2012
Research article
 | 
25 Jan 2012
Research article |  | 25 Jan 2012

Three-dimensional factorization of size-resolved organic aerosol mass spectra from Mexico City

I. M. Ulbrich, M. R. Canagaratna, M. J. Cubison, Q. Zhang, N. L. Ng, A. C. Aiken, and J. L. Jimenez

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Quantification of primary and secondary organic aerosol sources by combined factor analysis of extractive electrospray ionisation and aerosol mass spectrometer measurements (EESI-TOF and AMS)
Yandong Tong, Lu Qi, Giulia Stefenelli, Dongyu Simon Wang, Francesco Canonaco, Urs Baltensperger, André Stephan Henry Prévôt, and Jay Gates Slowik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7265–7291, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7265-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7265-2022, 2022
Short summary
A new method for calculating average visibility from the relationship between extinction coefficient and visibility
Zefeng Zhang, Hengnan Guo, Hanqing Kang, Jing Wang, Junlin An, Xingna Yu, Jingjing Lv, and Bin Zhu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7259–7264, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7259-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7259-2022, 2022
Short summary
In situ particle sampling relationships to surface and turbulent fluxes using large eddy simulations with Lagrangian particles
Hyungwon John Park, Jeffrey S. Reid, Livia S. Freire, Christopher Jackson, and David H. Richter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7171–7194, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7171-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7171-2022, 2022
Short summary
The effect of the averaging period for PMF analysis of aerosol mass spectrometer measurements during offline applications
Christina Vasilakopoulou, Iasonas Stavroulas, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, and Spyros N. Pandis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6419–6431, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6419-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6419-2022, 2022
Short summary
Calibrating networks of low-cost air quality sensors
Priyanka deSouza, Ralph Kahn, Tehya Stockman, William Obermann, Ben Crawford, An Wang, James Crooks, Jing Li, and Patrick Kinney
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6309–6328, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6309-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aiken, A. C., de Foy, B., Wiedinmyer, C., DeCarlo, P. F., Ulbrich, I. M., Wehrli, M. N., Szidat, S., Prevot, A. S. H., Noda, J., Wacker, L., Volkamer, R., Fortner, E., Wang, J., Laskin, A., Shutthanandan, V., Zheng, J., Zhang, R., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Molina, L. T., Sosa, G., Querol, X., and Jimenez, J. L.: Mexico city aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 2: Analysis of the biomass burning contribution and the non-fossil carbon fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5315–5341, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5315-2010, 2010.
Alfarra, M. R., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Boudries, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Garforth, A. A., Li, S. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of Urban and Rural Organic Particulate in the Lower Fraser Valley Using Two Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometers, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5745–5758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.054, 2004.
Allan, J. D., Jimenez, J. L., Williams, P. I., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., Jayne, J. T., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Quantitative Sampling Using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer – 1. Techniques of Data Interpretation and Error Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4090, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002358, 2003.
Download