Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year
    3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore
    3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 60 Scimago H
    index 60
Volume 6, issue 5 | Copyright

Special issue: Carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases, and related measurement...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1201-1216, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1201-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 14 May 2013

Research article | 14 May 2013

Feasibility study of using a "travelling" CO2 and CH4 instrument to validate continuous in situ measurement stations

S. Hammer1, G. Konrad1, A. T. Vermeulen2, O. Laurent3, M. Delmotte3, A. Jordan4, L. Hazan3, S. Conil5, and I. Levin1 S. Hammer et al.
  • 1Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Heidelberg University, Germany
  • 2Energy research Center of the Netherlands (ECN), Petten, the Netherlands
  • 3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 4Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
  • 5Agence Nationale pour la gestion des Déchets Radioactifs (ANDRA), Bure, France

Abstract. In the course of the ICOS (Integrated Carbon Observation System) Demonstration Experiment a feasibility study on the usefulness of a travelling comparison instrument (TCI) was conducted in order to evaluate continuous atmospheric CO2 and CH4 measurements at two European stations. The aim of the TCI is to independently measure ambient air in parallel to the standard station instrumentation, thus providing a comprehensive comparison that includes the sample intake system, the instrument itself as well as its calibration and data evaluation. Observed differences between the TCI and a gas chromatographic system, which acted as a reference for the TCI, were −0.02 ± 0.08 μmol mol−1 for CO2 and −0.3 ± 2.3 nmol mol−1 for CH4. Over a period of two weeks each, the continuous CO2 and CH4 measurements at two ICOS field stations, Cabauw (CBW), the Netherlands and Houdelaincourt (Observatoire Pérenne de l'Environnement, OPE), France, were compared to co-located TCI measurements. At Cabauw mean differences of 0.21 ± 0.06 μmol mol−1 for CO2 and 0.41 ± 0.50 nmol mol−1 for CH4 were found. For OPE the mean differences were 0.13 ± 0.07 μmol mol−1 for CO2 and 0.44 ± 0.36 nmol mol−1 for CH4. Offsets arising from differences in the working standard calibrations or leakages/contaminations in the drying systems are too small to explain the observed differences. Hence the most likely causes of these observed differences are leakages or contaminations in the intake lines and/or their flushing pumps. For the Cabauw instrument an additional error contribution originates from insufficient flushing of standard gases. Although the TCI is an extensive quality control approach it cannot replace other quality control systems. Thus, a comprehensive quality management strategy for atmospheric monitoring networks is proposed as well.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share