Articles | Volume 7, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014
Research article
 | 
29 Jul 2014
Research article |  | 29 Jul 2014

Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing: an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3

G. Fratini and M. Mauder

Related authors

A long-term (2005–2019) eddy covariance data set of CO2 and H2O fluxes from the Tibetan alpine steppe
Felix Nieberding, Christian Wille, Gerardo Fratini, Magnus O. Asmussen, Yuyang Wang, Yaoming Ma, and Torsten Sachs
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2705–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2705-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2705-2020, 2020
Short summary
A robust data cleaning procedure for eddy covariance flux measurements
Domenico Vitale, Gerardo Fratini, Massimo Bilancia, Giacomo Nicolini, Simone Sabbatini, and Dario Papale
Biogeosciences, 17, 1367–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Eddy covariance flux errors due to random and systematic timing errors during data acquisition
Gerardo Fratini, Simone Sabbatini, Kevin Ediger, Brad Riensche, George Burba, Giacomo Nicolini, Domenico Vitale, and Dario Papale
Biogeosciences, 15, 5473–5487, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018, 2018
Short summary
An improved dust emission model – Part 1: Model description and comparison against measurements
J. F. Kok, N. M. Mahowald, G. Fratini, J. A. Gillies, M. Ishizuka, J. F. Leys, M. Mikami, M.-S. Park, S.-U. Park, R. S. Van Pelt, and T. M. Zobeck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13023–13041, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13023-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13023-2014, 2014
Short summary
Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling
A. Budishchev, Y. Mi, J. van Huissteden, L. Belelli-Marchesini, G. Schaepman-Strub, F. J. W. Parmentier, G. Fratini, A. Gallagher, T. C. Maximov, and A. J. Dolman
Biogeosciences, 11, 4651–4664, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill
Pramod Kumar, Christopher Caldow, Grégoire Broquet, Adil Shah, Olivier Laurent, Camille Yver-Kwok, Sebastien Ars, Sara Defratyka, Susan Warao Gichuki, Luc Lienhardt, Mathis Lozano, Jean-Daniel Paris, Felix Vogel, Caroline Bouchet, Elisa Allegrini, Robert Kelly, Catherine Juery, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1229–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms
Gang Wang, Chunlai Yu, Kai Guo, Haisong Guo, and Yibo Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 181–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024, 2024
Short summary
New insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment: calibration functions traceable to one ozone reference instrument
Herman G. J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 73–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of spikes in continuous ground-based in situ time series of CO2, CH4 and CO: an extended experiment within the European ICOS Atmosphere network
Paolo Cristofanelli, Cosimo Fratticioli, Lynn Hazan, Mali Chariot, Cedric Couret, Orestis Gazetas, Dagmar Kubistin, Antti Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Tuomas Laurila, Matthias Lindauer, Giovanni Manca, Michel Ramonet, Pamela Trisolino, and Martin Steinbacher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5977–5994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Data treatment and corrections for estimating H2O and CO2 isotope fluxes from high-frequency observations
Robbert P. J. Moonen, Getachew A. Adnew, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, David J. Bonell Fontas, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5787–5810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds): Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 460 pp., 2012.
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, 1996.
Foken, T., Göckede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B. D., and Munger, J. W.: Post-field data quality control, in: Handbook of Micrometeorology. A Guide for Surface Flux Measurements, edited by: Lee, X., Massman, W. J., and Law, B. E., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 181–208, 2004.
Foken, T., Leuning, R., Oncley, S. P., Mauder, M., and Aubinet, M.: Corrections and data quality, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, 85–132, 2012.
Fratini, G., Ibrom, A., Arriga, N., Burba, G., and Papale, D.: Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 165, 53–63, 2012.
Download