Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 7, issue 10 | Copyright
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3307-3324, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3307-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 07 Oct 2014

Research article | 07 Oct 2014

Refractory black carbon mass concentrations in snow and ice: method evaluation and inter-comparison with elemental carbon measurement

S. Lim1,2, X. Faïn1,2, M. Zanatta1,2,3, J. Cozic1,2, J.-L. Jaffrezo1,2, P. Ginot1,2,4, and P. Laj1,2 S. Lim et al.
  • 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE), 38000 Grenoble, France
  • 2CNRS, LGGE, 38000 Grenoble, France
  • 3Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • 4IRD, Observatoire de Science de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG), 38000 Grenoble, France

Abstract. Accurate measurement of black carbon (BC) mass concentrations in snow and ice is crucial for the assessment of climatic impacts. However, it is difficult to compare methods used to assess BC levels in the literature as they are not the same. The single particle soot photometer (SP2) method appears to be one of the most suitable to measure low concentrations of BC in snow and ice. In this paper, we evaluated a method for the quantification of refractory BC (rBC) in snow and ice samples coupling the SP2 with the APEX-Q nebulizer. The paper reviews all the steps of rBC determination, including SP2 calibration, correction for rBC particle aerosolization efficiency (75 ± 7% using the APEX-Q nebulizer), and treatment of the samples. In addition, we compare the SP2 method and the thermal–optical method – Sunset organic carbon (OC) / elemental carbon (EC) aerosol analyzer with EUSAAR2 protocol – using snow and firn samples with different characteristics from the Greenland Summit, the French Alps, the Caucasus, and the Himalayas. Careful investigation was undertaken of analytical artifacts that potentially affect both methods. The SP2-based rBC quantification may be underestimated when the SP2 detection range does not cover correctly the existing size distribution of the sample. Thermal–optical EC measurements can be underestimated by low filtration efficiency of quartz fiber filter before analysis or dust properties (concentration and type), and overestimated by pyrolyzed OC artifacts during EC analysis. These results underline the need for careful assessment of the analytical technique and procedure for correct data interpretation.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share