Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2001-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Peer-reviewed comment
| 
06 May 2015
Peer-reviewed comment |
| 06 May 2015
Comparing satellite- to ground-based automated and manual cloud coverage observations – a case study
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 06 May 2015)
- Preprint (discussion started on 18 Dec 2013)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC C4123: 'Review: „Validation of CM SAF cloud fractions: can cloud cover be reliably derived by satellite data at Hannover, Germany and Lauder, New Zealand? – a comment“', Andi Walther, 27 Jan 2014
-
RC C4216: 'Review of Werkmeister et al on inter-comparisons of SYNOP, HSI and satellite observations of cloud cover', Karl-Göran Karlsson, 31 Jan 2014
-
RC C4271: 'Review of Werkmeister et al: Validation of CM SAF cloud fractions', Anonymous Referee #3, 05 Feb 2014
-
AC C4359: 'Answers to Comments by Referees 1, 2 and 3', Astrid Werkmeister, 11 Feb 2014
