Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.668 IF 3.668
  • IF 5-year value: 3.707 IF 5-year
    3.707
  • CiteScore value: 6.3 CiteScore
    6.3
  • SNIP value: 1.383 SNIP 1.383
  • IPP value: 3.75 IPP 3.75
  • SJR value: 1.525 SJR 1.525
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 77 Scimago H
    index 77
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 8, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3851–3865, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3851-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: CHemistry and AeRosols Mediterranean EXperiments (ChArMEx)...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3851–3865, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3851-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 21 Sep 2015

Research article | 21 Sep 2015

Intercomparison of two comparative reactivity method instruments inf the Mediterranean basin during summer 2013

N. Zannoni et al.

Related authors

OH reactivity and concentrations of biogenic volatile organic compounds in a Mediterranean forest of downy oak trees
N. Zannoni, V. Gros, M. Lanza, R. Sarda, B. Bonsang, C. Kalogridis, S. Preunkert, M. Legrand, C. Jambert, C. Boissard, and J. Lathiere
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1619–1636, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
The development of the Atmospheric Measurements by Ultra-Light Spectrometer (AMULSE) greenhouse gas profiling system and application for satellite retrieval validation
Lilian Joly, Olivier Coopmann, Vincent Guidard, Thomas Decarpenterie, Nicolas Dumelié, Julien Cousin, Jérémie Burgalat, Nicolas Chauvin, Grégory Albora, Rabih Maamary, Zineb Miftah El Khair, Diane Tzanos, Joël Barrié, Éric Moulin, Patrick Aressy, and Anne Belleudy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3099–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3099-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3099-2020, 2020
Short summary
Atmospheric observations of the water vapour continuum in the near-infrared windows between 2500 and 6600 cm−1
Jonathan Elsey, Marc D. Coleman, Tom D. Gardiner, Kaah P. Menang, and Keith P. Shine
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2335–2361, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2335-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2335-2020, 2020
Short summary
Intercomparison study of atmospheric 222Rn and 222Rn progeny monitors
Claudia Grossi, Scott D. Chambers, Olivier Llido, Felix R. Vogel, Victor Kazan, Alessandro Capuana, Sylvester Werczynski, Roger Curcoll, Marc Delmotte, Arturo Vargas, Josep-Anton Morguí, Ingeborg Levin, and Michel Ramonet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2241–2255, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2241-2020, 2020
Short summary
Sources of error in open-path FTIR measurements of N2O and CO2 emitted from agricultural fields
Cheng-Hsien Lin, Richard H. Grant, Albert J. Heber, and Cliff T. Johnston
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2001–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2001-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2001-2020, 2020
Short summary
Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A
Rachel Edie, Anna M. Robertson, Robert A. Field, Jeffrey Soltis, Dustin A. Snare, Daniel Zimmerle, Clay S. Bell, Timothy L. Vaughn, and Shane M. Murphy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 341–353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Ammann, C., Brunner, A., Spirig, C., and Neftel, A.: Technical note: Water vapour concentration and flux measurements with PTR-MS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4643–4651, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4643-2006, 2006.
Archibald, A. T., Petit, A. S., Percival, C. J., Harvey, J. N., and Shallcross, D. E.: On the importance of the reaction between OH and RO2 radicals, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 10, 102–108, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.216, 2009.
Atkinson, R., Aschmann, S. M., Winer, A. M., and Carter, W. P. L.: Rate constants for the gas phase reactions of OH radicals and O3 with pyrrole at 295 ± 1 K and atmospheric pressure, Atmos. Environ., 18, 2105–2107, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(84)90196-3, 1984.
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume III – gas phase reactions of inorganic halogens, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 981–1191, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-981-2007, 2007.
Bracho-Nunez, A., Welter, S., Staudt, M., and Kesselmeier, J.: Plant-specific volatile organic compound emission rates from young and mature leaves of Mediterranean vegetation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D16304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015521, 2011.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Our manuscript shows results of an intercomparison exercise conducted on two home-built comparative reactivity method (CRM) instruments operating under the same settings for measuring total OH reactivity. Despite the corrections of the raw data sets for instrumental artifacts having different weights on the two CRMs, we found very consistent results for the final processed data of ambient OH reactivity. Furthermore, we present in detail how to validate the instruments and process the raw data.
Our manuscript shows results of an intercomparison exercise conducted on two home-built...
Citation