Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 8, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3867–3892, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3867-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3867–3892, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3867-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 23 Sep 2015

Research article | 23 Sep 2015

Comprehensive laboratory and field testing of cavity ring-down spectroscopy analyzers measuring H2O, CO2, CH4 and CO

C. Yver Kwok1, O. Laurent1, A. Guemri1, C. Philippon1, B. Wastine1,a, C. W. Rella2, C. Vuillemin1, F. Truong1, M. Delmotte1, V. Kazan1, M. Darding1, B. Lebègue1, C. Kaiser1,b, I. Xueref-Rémy1, and M. Ramonet1 C. Yver Kwok et al.
  • 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement (LSCE/IPSL), CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Centre d'Etudes Orme des Merisiers, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Picarro Inc., 3105 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, CA, USA
  • anow at: Air Normand, 3 Place de la Pomme d'Or, 76000 Rouen, France
  • bnow at: Laboratoire National de métrologie et d'essais, (LNE), 1 rue Gaston Boissier, 75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France

Abstract. To develop an accurate measurement network of greenhouse gases, instruments in the field need to be stable and precise and thus require infrequent calibrations and a low consumption of consumables. For about 10 years, cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyzers have been available that meet these stringent requirements for precision and stability. Here, we present the results of tests of CRDS instruments in the laboratory (47 instruments) and in the field (15 instruments). The precision and stability of the measurements are studied. We demonstrate that, thanks to rigorous testing, newer models generally perform better than older models, especially in terms of reproducibility between instruments. In the field, we see the importance of individual diagnostics during the installation phase, and we show the value of calibration and target gases that assess the quality of the data. Finally, we formulate recommendations for use of these analyzers in the field.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present the results of tests of CRDS instruments in the laboratory (47 instruments) and in the field (15 instruments). We demonstrate that, thanks to rigorous testing, newer models generally perform better than older models, especially in terms of reproducibility between instruments. In the field, we see the importance of individual diagnostics during the installation phase, and we show the value of calibration and target gases that assess the quality of the data.
We present the results of tests of CRDS instruments in the laboratory (47 instruments) and in...
Citation