Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Volume 8, issue 12
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5063–5087, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5063-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 02 Dec 2015

Research article | 02 Dec 2015

ACTRIS ACSM intercomparison – Part 1: Reproducibility of concentration and fragment results from 13 individual Quadrupole Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitors (Q-ACSM) and consistency with co-located instruments

V. Crenn et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 2,821 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,256 1,478 87 2,821 541 62 107
  • HTML: 1,256
  • PDF: 1,478
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 2,821
  • Supplement: 541
  • BibTeX: 62
  • EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jul 2015)
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
Saved (discussion paper)  
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 13 Dec 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
A large intercomparison study of 13 Q-ACSM was conducted for a 3-week period in the region of Paris to evaluate the performance of this instrument and to monitor the major NR-PM1 chemical components. Reproducibility expanded uncertainties of Q-ACSM concentration measurements were found to be 9, 15, 19, 28, and 36% for NR-PM1, NO3, OM, SO4, and NH4, respectively. Some recommendations regarding best calibration practices, standardized data processing and data treatment are also provided.
A large intercomparison study of 13 Q-ACSM was conducted for a 3-week period in the region of...
Citation