Articles | Volume 9, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2119-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2119-2016
Research article
 | 
13 May 2016
Research article |  | 13 May 2016

Algorithm update of the GOSAT/TANSO-FTS thermal infrared CO2 product (version 1) and validation of the UTLS CO2 data using CONTRAIL measurements

Naoko Saitoh, Shuhei Kimoto, Ryo Sugimura, Ryoichi Imasu, Shuji Kawakami, Kei Shiomi, Akihiko Kuze, Toshinobu Machida, Yousuke Sawa, and Hidekazu Matsueda

Data sets

CONTRAIL project Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner project http://www.cger.nies

GOSAT project Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite project http://www.gosat.nies.go.jp/en/

American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker W. Peters, A. R. Jacobson, C. Sweeney, A. E. Andrews, T. J. Conway, K. Masarie, J. B. Miller, L. M. P. Bruhwiler, G. Petron, A. I. Hirsch, D. E. J. Worthy, G. R. van der Werf, J. T. Randerson, P. O. Wennberg, M. C. Krol, and P. P. Tans http://carbontracker.noaa.gov

Download
Short summary
This study compared GOSAT/TANSO-FTS thermal infrared (TIR) V1 and CONTRAIL CME CO2 data in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. The TIR CO2 averages agreed with the CME CO2 averages within 0.1 and 0.5 % in the Southern and Northern Hemisphere. At northern low and middle latitudes, their agreements were worse in spring and summer. The negative bias there made the maximum of TIR data being lower than that of CME data, which leads to underestimating the amplitude of CO2 seasonal variation.