Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3567-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3567-2016
Research article
 | 
03 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 03 Aug 2016

Satellite observation of atmospheric methane: intercomparison between AIRS and GOSAT TANSO-FTS retrievals

Mingmin Zou, Xiaozhen Xiong, Naoko Saitoh, Juying Warner, Ying Zhang, Liangfu Chen, Fuzhong Weng, and Meng Fan

Related authors

MACHINE LEARNING BASED BIAS CORRECTION FOR MODIS AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH IN BEIJING
M. Wang, M. Fan, Z. Wang, L. Chen, L. Bai, Y. Chen, and M. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-1-2023, 395–402, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-395-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-395-2023, 2023
Estimation of CH4 emission based on an advanced 4D-LETKF assimilation system
Jagat S. H. Bisht, Prabir K. Patra, Masayuki Takigawa, Takashi Sekiya, Yugo Kanaya, Naoko Saitoh, and Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1823–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, 2023
Short summary
Carbon dioxide variations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere from GOSAT TANSO-FTS TIR profile data
Akihiro Honda, Nawo Eguchi, and Naoko Saitoh
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-46,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-46, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Methane vertical profiles over the Indian subcontinent derived from the GOSAT/TANSO-FTS thermal infrared sensor
Dmitry A. Belikov, Naoko Saitoh, Prabir K. Patra, and Naveen Chandra
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-101,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-101, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Atmospheric ammonia retrieval from the TANSO-FTS/GOSAT thermal infrared sounder
Yu Someya, Ryoichi Imasu, Kei Shiomi, and Naoko Saitoh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 309–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents
Evan D. Sherwin, Sahar H. El Abbadi, Philippine M. Burdeau, Zhan Zhang, Zhenlin Chen, Jeffrey S. Rutherford, Yuanlei Chen, and Adam R. Brandt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 765–782, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-765-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water vapor measurements inside clouds and storms using a differential absorption radar
Luis F. Millán, Matthew D. Lebsock, Ken B. Cooper, Jose V. Siles, Robert Dengler, Raquel Rodriguez Monje, Amin Nehrir, Rory A. Barton-Grimley, James E. Collins, Claire E. Robinson, Kenneth L. Thornhill, and Holger Vömel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 539–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of the first year of Pandora NO2 measurements over Beijing and application to satellite validation
Ouyang Liu, Zhengqiang Li, Yangyan Lin, Cheng Fan, Ying Zhang, Kaitao Li, Peng Zhang, Yuanyuan Wei, Tianzeng Chen, Jiantao Dong, and Gerrit de Leeuw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 377–395, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-377-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-377-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of MUSES NH3 observations from AIRS and CrIS against aircraft measurements from DISCOVER-AQ and a surface network in the Magic Valley
Karen E. Cady-Pereira, Xuehui Guo, Rui Wang, April B. Leytem, Chase Calkins, Elizabeth Berry, Kang Sun, Markus Müller, Armin Wisthaler, Vivienne H. Payne, Mark W. Shephard, Mark A. Zondlo, and Valentin Kantchev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 15–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-15-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-15-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance and sensitivity of column-wise and pixel-wise methane retrievals for imaging spectrometers
Alana K. Ayasse, Daniel Cusworth, Kelly O'Neill, Justin Fisk, Andrew K. Thorpe, and Riley Duren
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6065–6074, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6065-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6065-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aumann, H. H., Chahine, M. T., Gautier, C., Goldberg, M. D., Kalnay, E., McMillin, L. M., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P. W., Smith, W. L., Staelin, D. H., Strow, L. L., and Susskind, J.: AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the aqua mission: Design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote S., 41, 253–264, 2003.
Baldridge, A. M., Hook, S. J., Grove, C. I., and Rivera, G.: The ASTER Spectral Library Version 2.0., Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 711–715, 2009.
Crevoisier, C., Nobileau, D., Fiore, A. M., Armante, R., Chédin, A., and Scott, N. A.: Tropospheric methane in the tropics – first year from IASI hyperspectral infrared observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6337–6350, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6337-2009, 2009.
Crevoisier, C., Nobileau, D., Armante, R., Crépeau, L., Machida, T., Sawa, Y., Matsueda, H., Schuck, T., Thonat, T., Pernin, J., Scott, N. A., and Chédin, A.: The 2007–2011 evolution of tropical methane in the mid-troposphere as seen from space by MetOp-A/IASI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4279–4289, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4279-2013, 2013.
Deeter, M. N., Edwards, D. P., Gille, J. C., and Drummond, J. R.: Sensitivity of MOPITT observations to carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008929, 2007.
Download
Short summary
Both AIRS and GOSAT TANSO-FTS TIR have been used to retrieve atmosphere CH4. The purpose of an intercomparison is to provide useful information to users on the characteristics of these two different products when they investigate the spatial and temporal variation of CH4. On the other hand, AIRS V6 CH4 data were already validated by comparing with aircraft data. This intercomparison is also a kind of indirect validation to GOSAT data.